a small difference, but important to how people use the site

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re not redundant functions. They’re… Mixed up on kbin right now, because things were originally built with the up button boosting content, but that’s incongruent with how Lemmy does it, so it was changed.

        But boosting isn’t really about sorting at all. It’s about republishing content, so that it can be sent out to instances that have started following a group after the content was originally posted.

        • ShadowRam@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe it is more akin to ‘re-tweeting’ for your followers.

          All boosts you boost are not private and everyone can see everything you have boosted

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How it’s interpreted it is entirely up to the UI layer. On microblogs, it’s surfaced as a retweet-like behaviour, but it’s not surfaced at all here, really, except on kbin where it’s used to report who has reboosted something.

            At its core, it’s a republish button, and just as if you were to republish someone else’s blog post on your own blog, people can see, if they look closely enough, that you’ve done it.

            • artillect@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you follow someone on kbin, and they boost a thread, it’ll show up in your feed. It’s sorta like crossposting to your user page on reddit

          • Phlogiston@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This makes sense — but if nobody knows it there is lots of room for confusion.

            “Boost” seems more like “updoot” than “retweet“. Perhaps more importantly why would one retweet a comment? Rather than a post?

            • Kichae@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Perhaps more importantly why would one retweet a comment? Rather than a post?

              The way content propagation works here is that someone using Website A follows a remote content source (either a user, or a group – aka a “community” or a “magazine”), and the remote hosting website (let’s call it Website B) sends all subsequent content from that source to Website A, where the requesting user can then view it. If someone from Website A was already following that content source, then they get to see all of the content that Website A had already received, and benefit from earlier users efforts. But if that person was the first from Website A to subscribe to that content source, then they only get future content.

              It’s very similar to a, well, a magazine subscription in that way. NatGeo isn’t sending you their 150 years worth of back catalogue when you subscribe in 2023 (not that you should bother subscribing to NatGeo in 2023).

              The ‘boost’ button republishes content, though. Posts, comments, whatever. Hitting ‘boost’ on a comment republishes it, and once republished the group actor (the little bot-like construct that functionally is the group) sees it as new content, and pushes it out to everyone following it. This means it will reach websites that started subscribing to the group after the comment was originally posted.

              Boosting is how older content (where older basically means “from anytime before literally right now”) spreads through the fediverse.

              • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thank you so much for this explanation, it really helped some of this click for me. I don’t use kbin, so the boosting isn’t so relevant to me, but I’m beginning to understand some of how the federation works together.

                • Kichae@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not sure how Lemmy syncs and backfill, but under its hood, I imagine it’s doing the same thing, just automatically. Lemmy groups are really spammy with boosts when viewed from Mastodon, for instance.

              • Sorchist@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So this is one of those things like git, where you can’t explain how it works on the surface to a normal person because it barely even makes sense if you don’t know about the underlying plumbing. :\

                Not awesome, but I guess that’s what you get when you graft a reddit-like experience onto a fediverse that was more or less invented for microblogging.

          • density@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            is following individuals a common thing on lemmy/kbin?

            on reddit ti was possible but virtually nobody did it. all about the community not “influencers”.

            What I want to do is sho approval to the OP and make the post more likely to float to the attention of someone who will want it…

    • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, i’m working on my own Fedi software and i’m struggling with the point of boosting in the link aggregator context. It’s an odd overlap with Reddit-style reposting to appropriate subs, but based on the user.

      It makes sense in the Twitter UX, but i struggle to find it’s place in the Reddit UX.

      • luna@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think boosts have potential to be used for crossposts, and the current implementation are just crossposts to your profile. Though they’re likely here right now just because Kbin is a mix between thread and microblog software

        • RheingoldRiver@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yeahhhhhhh if boost came with like a menu: “Boost to: -Your Personal Microblog -Magazine’s Microblog [pick] -Magazine as Article [pick]”

          then the feature would be pretty baller

          (actually im not sure if your personal microblog exists so…maybe just the other 2)

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boosting is super important in all contexts in the Fediverse.

        When am instance subscribes to a content source - be that a user actor or a group actor - on behalf of a user, it only requests future content. Back catalogues are not fetched by default. Boosting re-publishes the content, so that it is received by new followers.

        With a group actor, the boost triggers the actor to reboot the content itself, sending it out to new subscribers to the group, and filling in that back catalogue.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          if old content isnt fetched for a newly subscribed instance to see, how are users going to boost that content in the first place?

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Users who can see the content need to boost it?

            Users who use the website that the community is hosted on have access to the full library of it. They need to boost stuff. And people who subscribe from remote sites need to boost older content that they’ve seen.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              but relevant users cant see it, its never fetched for them to see it. Sure users on the home instance can see it, but they’re on the home instance, it’s already fetched for them. Ive run into this problem on here, where there is a lot of content on other instances that isnt visible from kbin. I have the option of visiting the home instance to see it, but it takes me completely off of kbin, I cant boost it from that page.

              • Kichae@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Someone just needs to follow. The community owner either needs to seed the community to big instances using accounts on them, or people who find the community via other instances need to subscribe and know that fresh content will come. Then they can boost older content from the hosting site.

                Things take some conscious effort here. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “Then they can boost older content from the hosting site.” No that’s the problem. Like you yourself said back catalogues arent fetched. They can’t see the older content to be able to boost it, they’ll only see new content.

                  • Kichae@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If my instance follows a community at time t = T, and your instance starts following it at time t = T+10, I can boost content posted between T and T+9 so that you can see it.

                    Meanwhile, if people on the hosting instance boost things posted from times earlier than T, we both get to see them. Then, once they’re visible to us, we can continue to boost them for new instances to see.

              • Kichae@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is why the functionality was hidden behind the upvote button initially, but people wanted the arrows to match the arrows on Lemmy.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see it as similar to the “save” function on Reddit, except it’s public. I’ve started using it on things that I think I might like to read again later (and so by extension anyone who’s “like me” would probably want to read it too).

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should they? It seems to me that we should have way, way more control over how we choose to sort things.

      That should be one of the options, of course, but we can have so much more here.

    • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I literally do not see this boost button anywhere. I just spent 2 minutes mousing over every button around your comment and I cannot find it.

    • theodewere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i disagree, it’s a great functionality that people should learn… and here’s the simple point… you can BOOST a comment you disagree with, so that your argument AGAINST the comment will get more visibility… reddit is dysfunctional, and this mechanism can help fix one of the problems reddit cannot get rid of… this mechanism can help discussion, and fight against things like brigading…

      think about it a minute… someone makes a really TERRIBLE point that you can dismantle easily… tear it down, and BOOST the hell out of it… reddit cannot accommodate that… keeping those two functions separate is critical…

      this will help keep every thread from becoming a popularity contest that is entirely predictable, once people figure it out

      edit to add: i’ve only been using this platform for a few days… but i promise you, it works the way it’s supposed to… try it out…