spujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agorulekbin.runimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down10
arrow-up1392arrow-down1imagerulekbin.runspujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareLeviathan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoIt makes no sense. Sugar? good, cookie? good, sugar cookie? disgusting insult to its name and whomever has the misfortune of eating one.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-21 year agoComments like these are why downvotes are necessary. For one thing, your implication that all sugar cookies share the sins of this specific kind of sugar cookie? Disgusting. Bigoted. You’re cancelled.
It makes no sense. Sugar? good, cookie? good, sugar cookie? disgusting insult to its name and whomever has the misfortune of eating one.
Comments like these are why downvotes are necessary.
For one thing, your implication that all sugar cookies share the sins of this specific kind of sugar cookie?
Disgusting. Bigoted. You’re cancelled.