They seem to know that the market for privacy is more than people who want just want their private data safe. There are also people that use these services for controversial and or illegal shit. So they use these chuds and reach those spaces.
It’s the swiss business model. A lot of controversial and corrupted people, politicians hide their money in privacy oriented banks offshore. They make profits no matter where the money comes from.
A little bad press after the stuff is out doesn’t really matter all that much if that drives more profits. The backlash might even get them more exposure.
They apologize and say they’ll never do it again and everyone moves on.















We are living in a era of information warfare.
The only reason the genocide got to the people uncensored was because the geopolitical enemy had a mainstream platform that the genociding side/allies didn’t control.
So what did the genocidal side do? They tried to discredit them, smear them, ban them, and finally forced them to be bought out.
It had its own agenda but that aligned with showing the atrocities of the enemy. Other atrocities like those of Sudan and Syria were not this popular.
So yea, truth is more widespread if there’s an opponent that benefits in revealing them. For other things, YMMV.