They’re throwing matches onto a raging bonfire. Their contributions are largely inconsequential and far from responsible for the totality of Americans’ disdain for data centers. Fuck this article’s clickbaity headline. Also, here’s the actual source of this article: https://www.axios.com/2026/08/28/china-ai-data-center-backlash-bots
I’m the developer… I built it…
Contributer 2 of 2: Claude
One of these is a lie. Also, Showly is a good alternative to this slop.
Beautiful. Sony can’t seem to catch a break since killing their discs, and that makes me happy.
This is old news. It didn’t happen a second time.
A Google vetted source allowing code that compromises the end user? That’s simply not possible. The developer had to provide an ID to publish the code. It MUST be safe! /s
If you point a fake gun at a police officer they put a real bullet in you. As far as I’m concerned, when the police point a fake camera at you, you take them at their word and assume malicious intent. This was not a crime. Awful but lawful.
I’d do the same thing tbh
Leave it to AI to find a more efficient way to shoot yourself.
Oh, he’s talking about the other thing…
Yes. Anything made, posted, modified, or output by AI should be tagged as such, always, without exception.
The article without Yahoo: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/meta-zuckerberg-workers-morale-layoffs
This is so much more informative than that article, and as a bonus the site is actually usable.
*Always Been
No advertisement is ever appropriate, period. Advertisements should be banned. I don’t mind a ‘look what I made’ post, but when the post designed to convince me to give you money, I see an immediate conflict of interest that suggests advertisement rather than information. It’s hard to draw that line without knowing intention, so I don’t think those posts should be disallowed, but if your post asks me to click a link to a product so I can give you my money, I’m downvoting.
Require an AI tag for anything written in part or in whole by AI.