Having to protect your transportation vehicles also stretches your defenses.

I forgot Ukraine had Flamingo rockets so I was really curious to see what this post was about at first.

Don’t be afraid to try making your own modpack. There is a little bit of a learning curve if you’ve never done it before, but you could probably finish this in a single afternoon if you simply don’t let yourself go too crazy with the number of mods.

Get yourself a big-name alternative launcher like Modrinth (which I prefer) or Curseforge and then look through the mods that support either Neoforge or Fabric and settle on a Minecraft version with the mods that catch your eye. So long as you try to avoid having multiple mods that affect the same things, most mods will just work together out of the box and only require some minor tweaking of the config options to feel good. In the case that the mods you’ve installed just aren’t cooperating, a mod like Crash Assistant might be about to help you out as well as forums like this one, but the best method is just to disable half the mods, test, and then disable another half until you’ve narrowed down the culprit.

It sounds stupid to me too but I looked it up and it turns out there is a proven correlation between signature size and narcissism.

Not that I think you are wrong, but a believer could just say that your argument doesn’t apply because Karma primarily affects you in the afterlife.

How does that verse prove anything? It only works if you assume music is a good and permissible thing to begin with.

Your post seems to imply that this is some sort of conspiracy by local politicians but that’s probably disinformation itself:

From the article:

A fusion center in Philadelphia combed through spicy Internet comments from AI critics and concluded there is a growing risk of physical violence against data centers from “domestic violent extremists”, ranging from white supremacists to anarchists.

From Wikipedia:

In the United States, fusion centers are designed to promote information sharing at the federal level between agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Justice, and state, local, and tribal law enforcement.

It is much more likely that the federal government had an algorithm flag these comments and sent them to Philly law enforcement for review.

That looks rather small, does it have a big basement or something?

Could you explain why? People are agreeing with me more than you so far.

Wasn’t Amazon’s whole thing for a while that they weren’t going to relentlessly pursue quarterly profits? So they can care, they just often don’t.

You won’t ever know if you don’t ever try. Find some third spaces you think are interesting enough and put yourself out there.

Potentially face recognition, but primarily through the signals your phone outputs, like WiFi and Bluetooth signals.

I’m assuming these are all songs where it sounds like the singer is saying “may” instead of “me”.

To be clear, I agree with you like 95% of the way, it’s that last 5% that I still think you are overselling and would like you to be more careful with.

The problem is that Hardin’s argument simply isn’t much of a scientific one in the first place and is instead much more of a logical one. (I was being sloppy when I asked for direct evidence, so sorry about that.) Hardin made the massive assumption that people are wholly self-interested. If people are only trying to maximize their own share of the resources regardless of what it might cost others, then it is impossible to escape the competition that creates for the limited amount of resources that the commons provides. All of the examples and articles you’ve brought up attack that assumption and/or focus on the conclusions Hardin made based on those assumptions, but do nothing to actually disprove the fundamental argument behind the tragedy of the commons.

I think you are overselling it’s incorrectness and so horseshoeing back around to being like the people who oversell it’s truthfulness. Yes, the tragedy of the commons is misleading if taken in isolation, but something being misleading does not automatically make it scientifically incorrect. Do you have direct evidence or an argument for why the tragedy of the commons isn’t the most likely outcome if the circumstances just so happen to match the assumptions Hardin made?

What electronic music do you listen to?

There might be a more accurate sublabel for your exact position, but so long as the label is serving well enough in it’s purpose as a communication tool and it isn’t getting in your way in other ways, then there’s no reason to fret about it.

I

What do you mean that it remembers that people care for it?

I’m not from there so I don’t know how they would define it, I just found him interesting and was using progressive Christianity interchangeably with the kind of Open Christianity I see in this community. Depending on what you mean by “not blabbing about it”, your definition seems to match very well to what he says he believes. For example, at 25:58 in the video he says we ought to have the same love for a child on the other side of the world that we would have for our children.