

I have replaced a number of broken parts in my house using my 3D printer and it’s so nice.


I have replaced a number of broken parts in my house using my 3D printer and it’s so nice.
Abjads are butt.
The only linguistic argument I’ll accept is that using it amongst fluent speakers doesn’t cause linguistic arguments.
You’re kind of in pickle if it catches on though, no? Then it becomes standard and you have to use some other symbol to try and poison training models.
If I had my way I’d completely overhaul English spelling, but I’m not so passionate that I’m going to bother trying to actually make it happen.
From a hand-writing perspective, I’m a big fan of syllabaries. But when you have to use a keyboard, an alphabet is pretty damn good. English could easily switch to quasi phonetic spelling by repurposing redundant consonants and adding accents to voewls.
Qe íntréstíng qíng úbáüt ít ís qat ít’s stíl kind úf légíbl evn íf I don’t eksplan háw ít wïrks.


What’s I2P?
I think you’re right, but now we’ve got the issue that such a spectrum makes zero sense for a pure compound. Why can’t my memes be scientifically perfect???
What in the heck is that graph? Abundance as a function of time?? What? But the data looks a lot more like some kind of EMR spectrum?
Couldn’t you make it a bunker buster?
https://seattleareafelinerescue.org/decoding-stink-face/
My guess is this cat is doing it because it’s a real big smell.
It’s not even less hair follicles, it’s hair that’s shorter, thinner, and now blonde. You have hair on your nose, you just don’t notice it because of how short and thin the hairs are. So it goes with “hairless” chests.
Ah, yes, this would be a frustrating map to try and actually use.


They still do. Military exercises are not about determining which side is better. It’s about learning things, practicing things, simulating things, etc. Often times one side will fail and then the exercise will continue on as if they succeeded, because, again, the point is not to score wins and loses. It’s fact-finding. It’s training.
It’s kind of like of the F35 loses in dogfights to older planes whenever they test that scenario. If the F35 is in a dogfight in real life, a completely unrealistic number of things have lined up and gone wrong for that pilot. In real life the F35 would just shoot the older planes out of the sky from the other side of the horizon.
It’s a much closer approximation, anyway.


High security stuff where anything electronic is a spy device until thoroughly proven otherwise. You’re not going to get a specific answer unless OP is an idiot.
Apparently Traumatic™ is different from traumatic with no emphasis. I am not a neurologist but it’s my understanding that you can sit people in fMRI (or other brain activity monitoring systems) along with other monitoring systems and watch the difference between a normal memory and a flash-back. Like the Traumatic™ will function differently in ways you can measure. I learned about it from The Body Keeps the Score but I haven’t read further than that. If you have resources that aren’t too technical let me know. Some of what was in that book was pretty soft science, but the Traumatic™ memory stuff was pretty hard as far as I could tell.
All you do is turn it into a flat check that everyone gets once a year. The rich would literally subsidize everyone else. Most people would make money from the tax.
Also, you add in a cap and trade market and eventually reduce the limit to zero. Credits can’t be generated unless you literally bury non-volatile, non-decomposing carbon 500 meters or more under ground.
Denovo Techniques in Waste Generation and Cost Overruns: A Look Into the Walrus-Dragon Lab Methodology
What’s the difference if your food has an expiration date?