No you’d still have 9 hearing a case you’d just have sets. There’s no rule that says every justice has to hear every case. Staye courts already work this way.

You want more justices so they hear more cases, it’s like 80% of cases requesting supreme Court review never see the Supreme Court because they say they don’t have the time and their caseload is too high.

Bingo. The biggest won the supreme Court ever got was the ability to pick and choose what they want to hear and when based on the idea that they only have so much time and so many justices.

Increase the justices and make any case seen by a random pool of justices so everything can be heard and you can’t shop for the justices you want to hear your case.

I mean they did admit to making fake bombs and planting them then called in bomb threats.

The reaction they got was crazy for sure 100% but let’s not color them out to be some incredibly innocent benevolent society of pacifists.

They don’t equate socialism and marxism, they haven’t read Marx like most people and implies think anything left of Bill Clinton is Marxist because that’s what talking heads have told them.

Literally every single time they’ve been caught in court.

They don’t, the court systems do.

It’s arguable that the limitations would have to change given the current sitting president limitation. Sorta like the timers that don’t start until discovery could have, should have or did happen.

5150 only applies to things in the dsm5 or idc11 and I haven’t heard any medical society attempt to add it to either.

If you think California cops are bad you must not have visited the shit hole known as Texas.

No. Wide area anonymous geo fenced warrants are still kosher there just can’t be pii to reveal anyone without a warrant based on ras or pc.

This ruling specifically said the issue was when they moved from wide area anonymous information to requesting and gaining pii that would require ras or pc to get a warrant or doesn’t matter if the company that holds it is volunteering it upon simple request.

I mean people are mistaken about that here too the same is true the lines are just increasingly blurred. Technically speaking it is not legal to use deadly force against a thief, there needs to be a reasonable fear of bodily injury for yourself or anyone else for that matter. If someone breaks in and you’re safe and you know they’re just taking stuff you can’t pop out and start blasting.

All the criminals wait for me to unlock and load a shotgun, they’re real amenable about that sort of thing.

A secured firearm Is a good idea, that said a locked away firearm is useless in any meaningful self defense action. Secure ≠ locked

Yes, searching it for a specific person would require a warrant and given how their typically gained it would be a series a warrants that narrow down areas then people.

The government needs a warrant to gain it for any specific person. They can however get a warrant for a large area, narrow down suspects by Geo data and then get a warrant for whomever to get pii to find out who’s device it is.

Pointing out there should be an investigation into presidential health so we don’t have another Reagan or iirc Johnson (?) isn’t rude it’s the literal job of checks and balances.

That’s exactly what he did? Did you read the article?

Dude didn’t call him a pedophile, he said he’s sick and the Whitehouse is lying.

They are predators of mosquitoes and ticks, they aren’t supersoldiers of pest control like the study implies they are however a limiter in the ecosystem along with other animals people tend to kill and not think much about. It’s cheaper and easier to educate about not killing x than to eradicate a species and eat the consequences.

Service is mandatory for everyone 2 years 8 months for males two years for females 4 years if you’re doing it for citizenship.

Turns out that horrific for the environment and it’s easier to just tell people to stop killing opossums.

It’s usually trees that are good at growing straight like birch but as they’re growing when they’re young they’re bifurcated a bunch and pulled down to the ground. The main trunk is usually under 15’ so it’s fair safe to stand on to chop down the trees that sprout via epicormic growth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicormic_shoot

Yes, give it ten years and the government will try to quietly settle for a large sum. Generally you can’t sue the government for damages except for cases of actual malice.