

They don’t, the court systems do.


They don’t, the court systems do.


It’s arguable that the limitations would have to change given the current sitting president limitation. Sorta like the timers that don’t start until discovery could have, should have or did happen.


5150 only applies to things in the dsm5 or idc11 and I haven’t heard any medical society attempt to add it to either.


If you think California cops are bad you must not have visited the shit hole known as Texas.


No. Wide area anonymous geo fenced warrants are still kosher there just can’t be pii to reveal anyone without a warrant based on ras or pc.
This ruling specifically said the issue was when they moved from wide area anonymous information to requesting and gaining pii that would require ras or pc to get a warrant or doesn’t matter if the company that holds it is volunteering it upon simple request.


I mean people are mistaken about that here too the same is true the lines are just increasingly blurred. Technically speaking it is not legal to use deadly force against a thief, there needs to be a reasonable fear of bodily injury for yourself or anyone else for that matter. If someone breaks in and you’re safe and you know they’re just taking stuff you can’t pop out and start blasting.


All the criminals wait for me to unlock and load a shotgun, they’re real amenable about that sort of thing.
A secured firearm Is a good idea, that said a locked away firearm is useless in any meaningful self defense action. Secure ≠ locked


Yes, searching it for a specific person would require a warrant and given how their typically gained it would be a series a warrants that narrow down areas then people.
The government needs a warrant to gain it for any specific person. They can however get a warrant for a large area, narrow down suspects by Geo data and then get a warrant for whomever to get pii to find out who’s device it is.

Pointing out there should be an investigation into presidential health so we don’t have another Reagan or iirc Johnson (?) isn’t rude it’s the literal job of checks and balances.
That’s exactly what he did? Did you read the article?
Dude didn’t call him a pedophile, he said he’s sick and the Whitehouse is lying.


They are predators of mosquitoes and ticks, they aren’t supersoldiers of pest control like the study implies they are however a limiter in the ecosystem along with other animals people tend to kill and not think much about. It’s cheaper and easier to educate about not killing x than to eradicate a species and eat the consequences.


Service is mandatory for everyone 2 years 8 months for males two years for females 4 years if you’re doing it for citizenship.


Turns out that horrific for the environment and it’s easier to just tell people to stop killing opossums.


It’s usually trees that are good at growing straight like birch but as they’re growing when they’re young they’re bifurcated a bunch and pulled down to the ground. The main trunk is usually under 15’ so it’s fair safe to stand on to chop down the trees that sprout via epicormic growth.


Yes, give it ten years and the government will try to quietly settle for a large sum. Generally you can’t sue the government for damages except for cases of actual malice.


Why not, it’s a fun past time.


Notably protestors aren’t the government dipshit.


Conclusions section
And I quote : "Two years ago, the Russian Federation assumed control over Crimea after a “referendum”, ***which was not authorized by Ukraine and had “no validity” according to UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262, was held on the peninsula. ***Since then, Crimean residents have witnessed a sharp deterioration of the human rights situation, including the imposition of a new legal framework restrictive of civil liberties, abductions and disappearances, the shutting down of opposition media outlets and the silencing of dissenting voices through the initiation of repressive measures, including abusive criminal proceedings, targeting mainly pro- Ukrainian activists and Crimean Tatar institutions.
So illegal invasion in 2014.
And oh what’s that senpai?!
" Thus far in 2016, there have been no reports of disappearances due to possible criminal or political causes. However, nine people who went missing in 2014 and 2015 remain unaccounted for 120. There are grounds to believe that they were abducted, allegedly by members of the so-called Crimean self-defence paramilitary group, while most were known for their pro-Ukrainian positions. There has been no progress in investigations into the death of Crimean Tatar activist Reshat Ametov, who was killed in March 2014 after being pulled out of a peaceful protest by men in military-style uniforms. Likewise, the cases of ill-treatment and torture of people illegally arrested in the run-up to, and after the March 2014 ‘referendum’, remain not investigated. The failure of the authorities to follow up on such serious cases creates an atmosphere of impunity and of insecurity, particularly for Crimean Tatars.
So your slaughter according to your evidence is 9 people after an illegal invasion and occupation for 12 years? Am I correct? Or is there something specific you’re referencing?


It literally doesn’t. Go ahead and quote it for me my reluctant professor.


Ukraine war started in 2014 when Russia invaded, try again genius.
Also notably doesn’t say Ukraine was murdering anyone anywhere prior to Russias second invasion.
Literally every single time they’ve been caught in court.