You should get your prostate checked.

The nuclear vest bomb was in a movie I have a feeling have just watched.

There’s a commodore 64 amiga running HVAC in iirc a high school.

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/theres-30-year-old-commodore-amiga-still-controlling-heat-ac-19-public-schools/

Passing war crimes into law is wild.

With conscripted service no one under 40ish is by definition a civilian since Israel has service recall just like the US.

Judicial nullification is already a thing.

Refusing blood or breath regardless of age results in suspension in every state I’ve heard of.

No joke but to bring about the biblical end times, Trump is just a useful idiot to the folks with money and bad intentions.

Murder is strict intent and thus harder to prove. Manslaughter isn’t, you just have to take steps any reasonable person would understand could lead to death or serious bodily injury.

It does more than that, it puts a big ole asterisk next to everything they’ve had any association with and will make it much easier for people to avoid charges they helped bring.

Conventionally bombed maybe but nuking anyone carries devastating consequences for literally everyone else on the planet.

War powers - cancel election - narrow all power into the executive - god king names successor probably Barron

Essentially North Korea

1951 and they are no longer approved for use yet they are still called war eagles and that’s what they’re evoking.

It doesn’t now, it did you until iirc like 1960ish. One shoulder would have peace the other would face war, during war a few manufacturers made sets that only faced war hence war eagles.

It has not “always” faced the branch. Literally 30 seconds of Google or Bing or whatever will tell you that much at least it’s not true.

• 1951 https://web.archive.org/web/20250603093028/https://tioh.army.mil/Catalog/Heraldry.aspx?HeraldryId=15688&CategoryId=9170&grp=2&menu=Uniformed+Services&ps=24&p=0

You may have meant since but “always” is simply inaccurate.

War eagle. It’s a nod to wartime Colonel insignia, during war the eagle faces the arrows during peace it faces the olive branch.

Your assertion is in large part correct, but it was the 10th district where it ended, the supreme Court refused to review it so it’s still technically ambiguous.

Tooth infections can be very deadly if left untreated and quite honestly the treatments weren’t much better.

You’ve repeatedly insulted me, no one said it was all claiming I support Trump.

That was after you insulted me first boss, just reread the comments of you’re confused about chronology.

No they in fact do not, they can but that is not inevitable or obligate.

In this country it is legally not a war unless declared by Congress. Casus belli does not obligate the declaration of war.

Legally we aren’t. That’s not the only personal attack you’ve made either but you’re just repeating yourself at this point. Yes those are war crimes as well, it does not mean the US is at war, clearly.

It’s not a belief, it’s how the construction of the Constitution works.

You clearly do not.

No need for luck nor to condescend.

Bro the fact you’re taken to multiple personal attacks but can’t remember where or when is fairly telling.

That’s how it is legally defined in the United States like it or not that’s how it actually works.

It’s not a belief it’s the actual law.

An act of war and declaration of war are two separate things. Taking a head of state into custody is an act of war and yet we aren’t at war with them either.

Duh, that doesn’t change the fact that we are not at war.

Yeah no shit, two shitty nations using the same playbook doesn’t really change anything and Russian law allows Putin control over declaration of war, that simply isn’t how it works in the US.

You 100% are, and it 100% is a war crime and that is iirc the fifth personal attack on me.

It’s all of those things and a war crime.

You’ve proven my point but apparently don’t know you have. Though it is fairly amusing you insult my reading comprehension and quote that particular section without comprehending it.

It is when it’s an auxillary ship carrying civilians bud. You are just wrong.

Ya huh. The most successful subs of the class being designed to do just that is what? Coincidence?

Also wrong but clearly so at least.

Not allegedly, it was boarded and searched and Iran doesn’t have the unrep ability the US does unless you’re implying they docked somewhere and replenished munitions it was in fact unarmed. No one said preemptively, they didn’t even notify them after the strike. Sri lanka said they did not add I do not trust the US because it has time and time again lied about it’s actions.

We are not at war, we are taking part in special combat operations. After 150 days without approval from Congress we will be at defacto war. Until then we aren’t at war.

By not calling it a war I’m saying Congress did not approve and thus it is not a war. See above for why. But nice try at yet another personal insult.

It was a war crime, auxillary ships are not taken in the same way an active fleet ship is. The US did have other ships in the area notably the pict which had just left sri lanka from the same fleet exhibition.

That’s equivocating which is why I keep saying it and it is in fact defending the indefensible.

That is also a war crime, yes. Good job accepting that fact.

Agreed, I didn’t say this was an illegal order. I said it was a war because it clearly was.