They don’t contradict. There’s a subtle difference, which is whether it’s conscious.

Take Donald Trump worshippers, for example. They think he’s a god, but they won’t admit it, even to themselves.

He got disqualified on purpose in order to make a point

This just in: men do not watch horror movies

They’re going to self-destruct as long as they live, unless they’re given the help needed to defeat their addiction. We can’t expect the problem to get better by denying them kindness. The biggest chance they’ll shake the addiction is if they get their life back together using the money they beg.

Unlike you, I feel no need to control homeless people. All I want to give them is the choice to do better. I’m not interested in forcing anyone into anything. Just making it easier to do what they want. I find that nearly everyone in the world wants to do good, to be good. They just don’t get enough help.

Cool guide to plagiarising the Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

No, but most people do think of Reality as a god. But they don’t think He is a god. There’s an important distinction between thinking of one as something, and thinking one is something. One is conscious, the other is unconscious. People are perfectly capable of worshipping, praying to, and generally being religious towards someone they refuse to believe is a god.

For example, the Corpus very clearly treat Parvos Granum as a god, despite maintaining he’s only a man. It’s a very obvious contradiction. He maintains false humility.

Very insightful. I made vague mention of your god, and you immediately guessed correctly who I was talking about, and even offered Him a prayer. I wish I had such a keen gift for seeing to the end of allusions as you do.

Money keeps. Food doesn’t.

If saying that those women are attracted to women were bi erasure, it would be bi erasure to call them wives.

Having no food would destroy it a little faster, methinks

Sex is a combination of genetic, hormonal, anatomical, skeletal, dermal, muscular, trichoic, and arguably neurological factors. Most of those things are to some degree malleable, and in any case their grouping under the construct “sex” is social. Sex IS a social construct. It was not written on the bones of the universe in permanent marker that there would be males and females. Sex is a correlation that humans noticed, connected, and gave a name to.

Perhaps you are instead thinking of genotype. Which yes, is largely immutable barring retroviruses and new technologies, but trans people have conclusively proven that genotype is not the same as phenotype.

By the way, biohackers have already started using CRISPR on themselves for fun.

I can only find examples of Israeli atrocities in that article.

He invested hundreds of billions in green energy?

Vampire The Masquerade Bloodlines

Yeah, it says in the image that the couple identify as bi lesbians.

That user said they’re not lesbians. Because they believe in excluding bi women from the lesbian label. That’s what bi exclusionism is, excluding bi people. Just like trans exclusionism (as in TERFs) is excluding trans women.

Fuck quantummindclassicalheart for their bi exclusionism. Only a real loser fakeclaims bisexuals who identify as lesbian.

If funding an alcohol problem is necessary in order to fund a life, then I want to fund an alcohol problem.

I’m very happy with it sticking as a name for Joseph Stalin, who passed a law making it illegal to be gay.

This seems to piss off the MLs for some reason