• 219 Posts
  • 1.72K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle











  • The issue is most of our roadways are designed like strodes.

    We should design streets as streets, and design roads as roads.

    Roads have no cut curbs or driveways, no parking is allowed on a road. Traffic lights and intersections are minimized and roundabouts are preferred. Roads are like low capacity highways in a sense. Trails run beside roads as opposed to sidewalks to minimize conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.

    Streets are narrow and lower capacity, sidewalks and pedestrians are common. Street parking is allowed. Curbs and driveways are common. Speeds are low and intersections are other signalized or stop signs are used.

    This is a strode: 1000062248



  • You know speed cameras actually do reduce the speed of traffic.

    On top of that they only negativity affect those that speed (with fines). Where something like a speed bump effect both speeder and non-speeder.

    Streets and roads were speed cameras were installed in my neighbor actually became more pleasant to drive, walk, and cycle on. No more speeders tailgating others for example.

    Now yes your point is valid that a portion of the cash collected from speeders goes to pay for said cameras, but keep in mind it’s the speeders that are paying and not non-speeders or taxpayers.


  • If you can, send a email to voice your opinion regarding bill C-22.

    If you oppose this bill you can. Use the follow template as a start.

    Email: gary.anand@parl.gc.ca

    Subject: Say NO to Bill C-22!

    Hello Gary Anandasangaree

    I’m writing to ask you to oppose Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, and call on the government to withdraw it entirely.

    Bill C-22 would require internet providers, messaging platforms, and cloud services to build and maintain surveillance capabilities inside their own systems — capabilities that create serious security risks for every Canadian. We already know what happens when governments mandate these backdoors: state-backed Chinese hackers exploited similar loopholes in the United States in 2024’s Salt Typhoon attack, compromising millions of people’s private communications.

    C-22 doesn’t just replicate those vulnerabilities: it greatly expands them. It would compromise a much wider range of digital services. And it does something that compromises everyone’s safety and protection privacy both online and in-person further: companies would be forced to store a full year of metadata about every Canadian — records of where we go, who we contact, and when we did it — without us ever having been under investigation. Everything from which family members you talked to, conversations with your therapist, if you talked with your lawyer potentially exposing what you discussed.

    The limited safeguards C-22 contains are both overly narrow, and are compromised by a clause that lets future governments reinterpret basic terms like “encryption” and “systemic vulnerability” by future regulations, with no parliamentary debate required. That means the very limited protections in this bill are only as strong as the government decides they are, on any given day.

    Bill C-22 cannot pass in its current form. Please join me in calling on the government to withdraw it in full.

    Sincerely, Your name here Your address here with postal code