Frankly I don’t care if you believe it or not. I only honestly hope they none of your animals get to that point.

It’s not about a terminal disease it’s about chronic suffering. And yes, for humans as well im arguing for medically assisted suicide.

Your last point I don’t get either l: How do you intent to help a German Shepherd with an infected hip who has a survival chance of 0% for an operation? How do you intent to “help” any being with an illness where no medication exist?

You sound to me like the “just work harder” equivalent of health.

You’re full of strawmen to create a world that’s just wrong because of the choices other humans make. Please allow a world that is just uncaring to all living beings - and some of us are confronted with that more than you apparently are. And no, I’m no longer talking about animals.

Yeah, there are modules at least for fillets! But I’m really a non visual person who just wants functional stuff, I’m not knowledgeable enough when it comes to any special features.

For example I have no idea what “such tools” entails :D

Feeling with you, stranger friend!

Serious tip: don’t traumatize your child by making it over the top traumatic and they’ll be fine!

Your instinct is correct, kids have an amazing grasp on life and death.

I had and have the same topic with my back then three year old. I won’t go into details but death is a topic for quite a while now.

Be open, be honest and don’t shy away from translating it to his level: If he had a favorite toy that got destroyed it’s an emotional connection he can make for example.

One important thing for me to point out though because it caught me as a shock: true empathy is impossible for a kid that age. Meaning: the chance is high that hell say something that will be completely out of the blue or shocking - expect it and don’t be too harsh please, even when he’ll manage to trigger something ❤️

Because I assume you’re asking in food faith: Because animals suffer more - medication is not as available for humans. In nature they would starve or fall prey to hunters. As pets we rather give them something to die painlessly than to starve them.

To be clear: It’s literally “misery or death” - I hope you’ll never get into this situation but seeing a beloved animal suffer through something like this.

I mean good for anyone who’s into this - for me, I’ll stick with openscad though ( https://openscad.org/ ).

Same thing but with a dedicated language dedicated to 3D modeling, algebraic approach to shapes and a long history and track record.

In case you wanna give it a shot: I gave writing samples of myself from chat and emails to a self hosted LLM, telling it to extract the writing style deviations, key elements, common phrases, symbols, patterns, etc. Then gave that as a “answer it this style” system prompt expansion - works like … Quite okay. Still need to go over it or course but it doesn’t sound like marketing bullshit but conveys what I want.

Completely agree with your general assessment though! They’re getting better but the marketing machinery is crazy in their claims.

Because physically speaking, chaotic and unpredictable are two different things - and why it works so well on this case: it’s becoming a stochastic problem, not a deterministic one.

It’s an awesome area for machine learning: you didn’t need to understand the result and how it got created, it just needs to be “close enough”.

Oh I completely agree with that, just the jump to “a flawed model leaked” is too far. There’s already enough crap to mock, no need to make up additional stuff.

For those out of the loop:

Anthropic just repeated the exact claim all these years later

e.g. https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-mythos-latest-ai-model-too-powerful-to-be-released-2026-4 )

It’s bullshit. What leaked was their commandline tool source code (named “claude code”) - very juicy in itself but has nothing to do with their models.

Apparently the account got flagged, not even the repo itself.

By now I think they left the driver wheel to chatgpt and hope for the best.

It’s not connected. Don’t get me wrong I agree with your sentiment - but law doesn’t care about ethics or morale or anything.

“Public doctrine” is nothing they exists, legally. Toy are wasting bandwidth of change.org .

No the claim is dubious because it’s equalling “written on bank note” with “must be basis for legal discussions”.

I tried more “niche from a popular perspective”. You’re right, especially alpine is in the background of a lot of docker containers but rarely an end user who just want their desktop environment knows them.

For nixos I’ve not yet seen anyone in the enterprise world pushing for it - there it’s still all about containerization and orchestration in cloud environments, using that as reproducibility layer. That might change though with data sovereignty discussions going on.

I can see where you’re coming from! Specifically this community though I’ve not seen it a lot - you’re completely right though, the more native one becomes the more one is confronted with it.

I’m still struggling with the slowness of things (e.g. a quick endpoint change) and I can’t get my head around reason error messages “fluently”, i.e. I have to think about what the errors want to tell me instead of resolving it - a bit like old python stuff really.

And then there are the edge cases … It took me a long time to change the config the very first time while offline - which makes sense from a model perspective but from my user brain it was just … wrong :D

Perhaps I should switch my clients as well to get more exposure…

In addition to alpine id also throw nixos in.

It’s a real niche OS with a very different approach to setup and configuration than any other I’ve seen and tested. It’s now my server Linux and after more than a year I’m still not sure if I would recommend it 😂

If you are truly serious: this is not how hallucinations work. It’s really best to think of it as “fancy auto complete”. The hallucinations happen when the next token is too disconnected from what we as humans would call as “belonging together”. But it’s all math after all.

Limit the k value, tube down temperature and cut off context size and the issue of hallucinations is a non-topic for “transcribe and summarize”.

You get into what I’d call “stupid” territory like you’re describing.

Your second point I fully agree with and is the reason why I’d ask the doc directly. To give the personal anecdote: the transcript itself helps me to focus on exactly the topics you’ve described: who’s confused? Where was agreement? Where did people just not speak up?

A specific hallucination example I see every other day for example are tasks: that thing “thinks” that “we should” or “you must” are always tasks and outcomes which is utter bullshit - but I know that and using the transcript part helps me focus on the important part, the humans.

Counter top the popular opinion here for me it would be a clear yes in the situation you’re describing.

The relationship with my direction doc is more believable to me than principles of vague bad feelings for me.

Now taking and transcripts specifically are one of the use cases I also draw value out myself. I’d ask the doc though how they’re using it.

Still I’d rather have my transcript public than to go on that search for a doctor match again.

They (US politics) literally do though, right? At least that’s my impression as a non US person.

If my understanding is correct it would need an overhaul of the constitution to change that, right? (The part about representatives of states cascading to select the representatives who then select the boss).

I’m quite uneducated though in US politics so perhaps I’ve got something completely wrong!

Oh but that happened already! And is still ongoing.

For a long article about it, Wikipedia has us covered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_and_copyright

The very first litigation, Doe v. GitHub, Inc. is about training on copyrighted material but they’re touching on the copyright of output as well and connection to DMCA 1202. The leak pushed GitHub and anthropic - and by proxy Microsoft and OPEN AI - hopefully in a lose/lose situation. Although the lawsuits are already taking years and I would be at least as shocked as I’m cynical if the whole fiasco ended in a “rules for thee but not for me” situation - again.