• 0 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 9 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2026

help-circle




  • Agreed.

    I think a lot of people don’t realise that academic texts, especially in the humanities, are sometimes 90% quotes of someone else’s work. It’s easy to paraphrase someone a bit too close for comfort, and fail to cite previous works sufficiently or properly.

    This being said, even if this poor guy did plagiarise blatantly, hardly a national news story let alone so much coverage. Something that could have been dealt with internally and reported on when it was resolved. Quite obviously a deliberate racist right wing witch hunt.





  • As far as I can tell he’s slightly left of centre, not even particularly radical.

    Painting this man as a rabid communist, when as far as I can tell he’s mainly been fixing potholes, is a really stupid move from the right wing propaganda machine.

    Even if they think they’ll be able to rig the next elections, alienating half the population is a dumb idea.




  • Here’s the thing about some of these people: perpetuating the idea that being critical of the Israeli government or Zionism, is the same as anti-semitism, is in the Israeli government’s interests. It helps push the narrative that anyone who opposes the Netenyahu government is an anti-semite.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if at least some supposedly pro-Palestinian voices are managed opposition. People who wittingly or most likely unwittingly are repeating narratives that serve Israeli interests, paint critics of Israel in a bad light, and serve to divide the opposition to Israel internationally.

    For example, according to recent polling American Jews are quite critical of the Israeli government. American Jews are more likely than the average American to be critical of Netenyahu, more likely to think that the US is too supportive of Israeli, more likely to think that the US should support the Palestinians more, more likely to be in favour of the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, etc. etc. Who does it serve to alienate Jews in the US? You surely want the Jon Stewarts of this world to be on your side.

    It’s a bit like an agent provocateur who tries to turn a peaceful protest violent, because it’ll allow the authorities to paint protesters as violent thugs and scare off reasonable average citizens from joining protests.

    This being said, I assume most people being horrible and undermining the cause they claim to support, are simply complete and utter morons.


  • Of course, coastal reactors are vulnerable in other ways. Climate change can exacerbate extreme weather events. It’s the annoying thing about lots of stuff, you only really find out what goes wrong, when it goes wrong.

    Unknown unknowns, as some arsehole once put it.

    Also, coal contains small amounts of uranium and thorium which gets concentrated in the fly ash. Fly ash which then gets spread across the area surrounding the power plants. So I’m certainly not saying nuclear is obsolete or particularly dangerous compared to alternatives like coal.







  • Agreed.

    Of course, being openly critical online without actually doing much else, is also not necessarily particularly productive.

    For example, those who openly oppose the Russian government, are often managed or controlled. Whether knowingly or unwittingly, they help further the ruling regime’s political aims. Even abroad, supposed enemies of the Kremlin happily advocate the annexation of neighbouring countries or espouse Russian cultural superiority. Their loud pronouncements to the contrary mean nothing.

    A lot of of people protesting loudly are doing so to appear as if (or convince themselves) they’re doing something.

    For example:

    • going on social media and calling Vladimir Putin names, is far less effective than donating to the Ukrainian army and suggesting others do so too.

    • complaining about the erosion of freedoms and privacy on a social medium owned by a literal fascist, is far less effective than sharing alternatives to google, inviting them to the fediverse, helping people switch to linux, sharing DIY tips on how to use a buzzsaw or angle grinder, etc.

    • complaining about capitalism online or watching anti-capitalist tiktoks interspersed with ads, is arguably far less damaging to oligarchy than giving people tips on how to use a VPN or torrent a linux distro.

    In any case, as I mentioned in my earlier comment, I was simply referring to my being careful how I say things online, without necessarily censoring what I say. I think it’s fair to say we rely far too much on corporate owned and/or surveilled media. Far better to join a local group or organise in your community. There it’s far safer to be open than on a public and surveilled internet forum


  • I get where you’re coming from, and that it’s no guarantee of safety, but less obvious resistance like malicious compliance, strategic incompetence, ‘accidents’, and ‘everyday resistance’ can be a very effective strategy.

    As you yourself say, it may change who they go after first, allowing you to fly under the radar longer and fight longer while undetected. Then again, letting people know they’re not alone, is also important. So being loud also has its merits.

    Of course, I would never be too concrete about all this on the internet, for obvious reasons. I’m also not stopping anyone who wants to take a more brazen route. In some cases, when some campaigns go viral, it has also been effective.

    Put simply, there are advantages to appearing unthreatening, stupid, and boring.