• 22 Posts
  • 649 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle

  • It is a grand jury. That is the practice round for a trial. The prosecutor goes over the evidence and explains what argument they are going to make in court without the defendent or their lawyer present to argue against it. The role of a grand jury is to pump the prosecutor up and say “You got this. I would totally believe you if I was on a real jury.”

    The fact that in this case, the grand jury said “That is stupid. You have no argument. Just let the guy walk,” means that either the prosecutor is an incompetent idiot who did not understand what evidence he was presenting or the jury thought that no crime had been committed.










  • You can still have reliable migration without the user the ability to open a save on more than one system. For example:

    1. Tell the Nintendo servers that you want to migrate a game.
    2. Copy the game save into the migration app save then delete the game save.
    3. Migration app sends the game save to the destination system.
    4. The destination system checks that the save is fully downloaded and free of corruption. It tells the Nintendo servers that it is ready to finish the migration.
    5. Both the source and destination systems watch the Nintendo servers for the next step. Once it gives them permission to complete the migration, the source system can permanently delete the game save while the destination system copies the game save from migration app storage into game storage.
    6. If the destination system fails, the Nintendo server can abort the migration and give the source system permission to put the save files back. When the destination system recovers, it will be told by the Nintendo servers that the migration was aborted and to delete any save data it got.

    If global banks can transfer millions of dollars from account to account without money being created or destroyed, Nintendo can make sure that only one system is allowed to open up a game save.






  • I don’t see any mistake in Devolver putting out an IPO.

    I assume that when the founders started the company, they were not ultra rich and had to take investor money in order to get their first couple games to market. They likely hired people at below market rates in exchange for equity.

    Once the company became self sustaining and profitable, those people started asking about how they could turn the promises of equity into actual money. The easiest way was to IPO. Hopefully, the founders sold a bunch of stock when the company was at $250 per share.

    Now the stock is at $7.50 per share and the founders can buy back all the stock they sold and all the stock they gave away in leu of payments. If they did it right, they now have complete control of the company and a pile of cash, all at the expense of the investors who bought in at the public offering.