• 3 Posts
  • 914 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2025

help-circle



  • it is far more logical

    Yet based on an assumption made by you. So your logic is flawed.

    intentionally changed one word to piss you of

    Who said it went like that? Someone just didn’t copy-paste the title correctly, changing the essence of the message. Again you make poor assumptions, to prove your idea to be less idiotic. So to prove your poor assumption, you make the other option an even worse assumption. While failing to see something very simple: the fact the title is wrong.

    why is it triggering you so much when someone say “don’t make stupid accusations without proof”?

    It’s triggering me someone is behaving like you did. Do you talk like that to people irl too? If so, it must suck getting punched in the face all the time, doesn’t it?

    The proof is right there but you fail to acknowledge it, as you find your own assumptions more likely. So you behave poorly and your logic is flawed. If you don’t know what ‘proof’ and ‘facts’ are, you should open a thesaurus, work your way through it. So far you have shown the exactly same flawed reasoning of pseudoscientists and the attitude of a teenager on 4chan. I feel sorry for you.

    I’m not going to continue a discussion with you. I just hope you will be able to treat others with a bit more respect in the future.

    Have a nice fay



  • without a grain of evidence.

    Ok, let me explain what the evidence is:

    1. The title of the post
    2. The title of the original article

    Is it really that hard to get that?

    I clicked on the post as I thought it’s bullshit as I, who served in the navy for 15 years, did much more than 160Nmi without refueling many times. But apparently it’s about a record for an electric boat, as clearly states in the original article’s title. So the post’s title changed the original title to clickbait.

    But why is it triggering you so much that someone points that out? So much so you have to insult them as being childish? While at the same time behaving childish yourself. Are you just trolling for attention?







  • Back in school in chemistry they covered sugars. The fructose in fruit and HFCS are different molecules. HFCS is a mixture of refined fructose (different from natural fructose in fruit molecular wise) and sucrose. Just because they’re both called fructose doesn’t mean the molecules are the same. Just like alcohol. There are many different types of alcohol, like ethanol and spiritus. Both of which can’t be consumed safely and are different to the alcohol we do consume.

    Here’s a Wikipedia page on fructose. As you can see there isn’t just one type of molecule.

    Here’s a page on HFCS









  • There’s a difference between the fructose in fruit and stuff like high fructose corn syrup. Fructose is healthy in certain doses, like when eating fruit. When eating more than the amount found naturally in fruit it becomes unhealthy.

    When you make fruit juice, you don’t juice one piece of fruit but a number of them. This way the sugar concentration becomes higher, which can be of the level of coca cola of you use enough fruit.

    But in soda usually HFCS is used and sometimes sucrose. But HFCS is also a mixture of fructose and sucrose.

    There’s a difference between eating 4 apples and drinking juice/soda with sugar content similar to 20 apples, but refined sugars instead.

    Also the sugar molecules found in fruit are not the same as the ones in corn or pure refined fructose. One is better than the other.