Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 3.37K Posts
  • 3.63K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • Five days later, I’ve finally brought myself to watch it. Here’s what I’ve got.

    This is “Doctor Who” trying to do an episode of “The X-Files,” and falling flat on its face.

    It’s brightly (and flatly) lit, when it should be dark and moody.

    Murray Gold’s score is unusually lifeless, and seems to strike the wrong tone more often than not. Give me some mournful cello while they’re in Chloe’s room, examining her drawings.

    It tries to blend a story about aliens with more “mature” themes like child abuse and depression, and isn’t terribly successful.

    The “all it needs is the attention of the world” riff was basically done several episodes ago (and better) in “The Idiot’s Lantern.”

    Just a complete failure on damn near every level.

    But at least they do a better job of “mature themes” a few years later with “Night Terrors,” and of evil drawings with “Flatline.”



















  • Okay, I guess it’s time for some actual thoughts. It was all right.

    I’m not really big on Jungian psychology, but writers love it, since it’s so steeped in metaphor. It’s been many, many years since I studied it, so I’m just going to defer to Wikipedia.

    In analytical psychology, the shadow (also known as ego-dystonic complex, repressed id, shadow aspect, or shadow archetype) is an unconscious aspect of the personality that does not correspond with the ego ideal, leading the ego to resist and project the shadow, creating conflict with it.

    In analytical psychology, the struggle for the superego is to retain awareness of the shadow, but not to become it or be controlled by it. “Non-identification demands considerable moral effort [which] prevents a descent into that darkness”; and though “the conscious mind is liable to be submerged at any moment in the unconscious…understanding acts like a life-saver. It integrates the unconscious.” This reincorporates the shadow into the personality, producing a stronger, wider consciousness than before. “Assimilation of the shadow gives a man body, so to speak,” thereby providing a launchpad for further individuation.

    So sure, this is all fine and good. Taking stuff like this and making it literal has a long tradition in sci-fi generally, and Star Trek specifically. I’m glad they addressed La’An’s inner conflict without confirming her fears of her genetic heritage controlling her destiny. I hope they’re finally putting the subplot to bed - it’s hard to see where else they could go with it.

    Seeing Hemmer in the previouslys primed me to expect to see Caster show up, but nope.

    They had some fun with Carol Kane’s “Princess Bride” connection - too much fun, perhaps, but whatever.

    It’s a little disappointing that Ortegas in particular didn’t clock the imposter Pike and Spock immediately - the others I can forgive due to the ongoing crisis, but it would have been nice to see Erica had simply decided to go along with it for a while.

    Find yourself someone who looks at you the way Melissa Navia looks at Rebecca Romijn.