The browsers do no such thing. Domain names and servers are usually configured to redirect traffic as needed, but if you expect traffic on www.yourdomain.example the browsers won’t redirect yourdomain.example to it unless you explicitly tell them to.

The containers are still running on top of a monolithic kernel. The most popular Unix-like microkernel OS doesn’t support containers at all and needs to run Linux in a VM to get them. Linus was right.

They can. There are brands selling durable USB-C cables, I think they cost around 20 Euros each.

For Apple stuff, they will make it durable once their customer base stops being a cult.

It’s almost like planned obsolescence is a well document and viable business strategy.

Honestly, that makes him an even better cautionary tale. Autocratic movements will always eat themselves if allowed to live long enough.

They will do better if you give them a patch to re-apply, so it’s not going to be as bad. But the review effort is probably going to eat up the time saved applying the patch, since you can’t throw a coin on the LLM having done any kind of due diligence on side-effects.

Libreoffice also has a web version that desperately could use the effort going into forking "Russian"Office.

That’s a losing game because Microsoft will just break things on their side again.

The format that’s being used is the proprietary one whatever MS is calling their office nowadays shits out not the actual ooxml standard. This is just going to reinforce MS propaganda that alternatives are inferior when the office suit fails to properly open files on it’s own preferred format.

Less dependent on American tech would be to stop promoting an American format as a first choice.

Do they support actual standards, or are they insisting on implementing a broken version of Microsoft’s format?

Edit: to answer myself, they are still missing proper ODF support (https://github.com/Euro-Office/DocumentServer/issues/114). And by the rest of the issue board, they should have realised Microsoft will never let them have parity on OOXML.

Are they saying they are enslaving what they believe is a conscient being? Oof

For some reason they forgot to mention that this will screw up the water supply of some small cities like Berlin or Potsdam.

They are a Q short of a fair fight.

But since they don’t usually involve science or future technology, we should just include the fi… Or fiction for long.

What a nice collection of assorted criminals and sociopaths they are building there /s

TLDs can exists long after a country, the Soviet Union’s .su still exists.

If two countries merge legally then deciding what do what to do with the TLD would be part of the agreement or at least dealt by IANA and the merged country.

If it’s an illegal occupation under international law then the TLD would be probably be managed by some kind of government in exile.

Of course. Now let’s see if Adobe lawyers agree with… checks notes… Adobe lawyers that genai copyright laundering is legal.

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user) (reduce + scores  (filter pos? scores))

can be either

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user)
  (reduce + scores)
  (filter pos? scores))

or

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user)
  (reduce + scores (filter pos? scores)))

A linter will tell you that you counted wrong it will not tell you where.