• 1 Post
  • 4.73K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle


  • I don’t want something that was crafted to my taste. I want something so irresistibly unique that it redefines my taste.

    This really is the heart of the entire AI pitch; a world where everything is comfortable and familiar and safe and easy and fucking sterile. A world where you never interact with other people because your agents do it for you. A world where you read, watch and listen to endless generic slop tuned to what your tastes were at the moment that you froze them in amber and stopped actually living. A world where digital sycophants tell you how to live and dress and act and what to order at the restaurant so that your mind will never be troubled by a stray thought.

    Fucking Christ, I need to go listen to Angine de Poitrine to get the taste of this out of my mouth.











  • For anyone who reads this kind of stuff and gets worried (as if we don’t have enough real problems to worry about right now), let’s be absolutely clear:

    1. NATO is not attempting to isolate Kaliningrad and never has been. This is posturing aimed at a non-existent threat.
    2. Putin has been throwing around nuclear threats for years now, along with all kinds of other threats of escalation, because he knows they rapidly get traction in Western media. None of his “red lines” have ever amounted to anything yet, and none of them ever will, because…
    3. Putin’s only goal is his own survival, and there is absolutely no version of starting a war with NATO - especially a nuclear war - that he personally survives. Russia fires one nuke, Moscow gets deleted. It’s a matter of dispersion. NATO is an alliance, there’s no one single command center. But there’s only one Russia. At a fundamental level there is genuinely zero chance that he will follow through on this threat.

    This doesn’t mean that Russia isn’t a threat. Here’s what they’re actually going to do; they’re going to try to break up NATO. If Putin can do that, he’s no longer facing an alliance, he’s facing a weakened collection of European states that can individually be bullied into submission. Smaller countries like the Baltics can be absorbed, more powerful nations like Germany can be forced out of or into Russia’s sphere of influence as fits Putin’s purposes.

    This threat you’re reading about here? It’s a part of that plan. Russia announces that they’re being “forced” to escalate in response to completely imagined provocations by NATO. Meanwhile their troll farms spread “NATO is Western Imperialism” and “NATO are just leeching off of us” propaganda online (the former for the left, the latter for the right). Credulous westerners hear that NATO is provoking Russia into nuclear war and think “Oh my God why are we even in this alliance?”

    That’s the game he’s playing. And it’s going to get worse. There are going to be more direct provocations, from Russia, aimed at testing just how committed the alliance is to defending it’s weakest members. He’ll try to separate the little guys from the herd and pick them off, while eroding the major players trust in each other.

    That’s the real danger. Not that Putin is going to go nuclear over a threat to Kaliningrad that he made up.



  • I guess that still just sounds like an insurgency to me? Sorry, I’m not arguing with you or doubting you, just clarifying that none of what you’ve said really conveys what’s new or unique about the situation.

    I mean, you don’t owe me shit, if it’s too much to get into or whatever you’re free to just tell me to fuck off. I’m genuinely curious about what you’re seeing that’s different here, but it’s not not my place to make any demands of your time if you’re not looking to get into it.

    I appreciate the reply either way.






  • I don’t debate fascists. But for the benefit of anyone else who happens to read this far, overpopulation is a fascist myth propagated by people who, for some reason, never want to talk about exactly which people need to die in order for the rest of us to live.

    The reality is that a) human population is already on a trajectory towards a stable equilibrium, and b) the Earth provides more than enough resources for all of humanity. We’ve never had a problem with sufficiency, we have only ever had a problem with distribution and waste. If we built our societies around the idea of giving people what they need, instead of on the notion of how hoarding and controlling resources can enrich a few, no one would ever go hungry or without shelter or medicine or anything else they require.

    I’m on mobile right now, but I’ll try to provide some links later for anyone who is interested in learning more about this.