Librarian, Greek, Bateman, Turkic.
An unlikely alliance who are going to have to get along and work together if they’re going to stand any chance of beating the LGBT team in the big kickball match
This summer, don’t miss a second of the best comedy of the year.
Queerball!
You’re LGBT? Omg I love tyropita!! Sorry about the Colosseum…
They do. They said something to the effect of ~20% of body weight in 12 months.
There’s a bitter humor in “okay, Mamdani got traction with affordability rhetoric… Let’s see…”
“TRANS ISSUES DON’T MATTER TO POOR PEOPLE!”
Last time I did mushrooms I laughed until I threw up contemplating my friends who would grief children in among us games demanding “vote green or no tasks. Vote green or no tasks”
Which is to say I agree with McKenna because that was the moment the government broke its spell on me
I don’t remember a Democrat mentioning LGBT issues since Biden said there were at least 3 genders. Is he talking about their most popular AOC and Mamdandi or something? They don’t want to soullessly emulate the people who get votes?
Can I remove this from context entirely for a second? Pressing a button to talk to one of the pawns sounds like an interesting feature for rimworld. If they’re a researcher they sound different from a mining slave. Seems like an actual use for an LLM. If you comfort them they get a sliver of mood but if you harass them they get a stacking debuff of mood
I think the operative phrase here is too much. It reads to me the same as asking if humans breed too much. Like too much for what? For sustainability? That’s a question with an answer. The question about whether humans are going to breed is like “of course!” we just love it, don’t we folks 
. We’re going to do it the amount we do it. 6 year olds joke about Epstein. 16 year olds have probably gone viral using AI to make Epstein/Diddy/Kirk/Trump jokes. We’re just going to do it. The superstructure is like an eldritch beast that consumes content. If you got on camera and cried your eyes out pleading for us to stop, a music producer is going to sample you into a dubstep song.
Ohhhhh, I definitely skimmed the article and what you were saying and came away believing the duo were talking about a movie in which tourettes was being explored as a theme when it happened.
Then yeah, censoring would have been prudent. But all the same, the fallout should have been negligible because someone apologizes to the two actors. Short of that, the controversy should have been the negligence of the hosts. And I suppose they optimized for clicks with the title while trying to do justice with the first sentence being
Lindo said he and his “Sinners” costar “did what we had to do” while presenting, but he wished “someone from BAFTA spoke to us afterwards.”
So a lot of annoyances along the way to get to this point. It made for sloppy handling of the situation. Even if you’re not prepared, you, the people in charge of the event, not the person with the disability, just go up to them and say sorry.
“according to our studies, being trans is a valid expression of self”
“That can’t be!”
“It appears we did the Tuskegee experiment all over again”
“If what you’re saying is true, then even if we recognize them now in this hypothetical, it’s not a funny, positive outcome because people were harmed needlessly!”
“Yes, but since we’re hypothetical, does anything we do matter?”
“I guess not”
They kiss gayly
I think about Alan Watts when he talks about how wanting to be rid of the situation is part of the pain. Like the blister after touching a hot stove, the waiting is part of the grief.
Perhaps it’s what people meant when they say “it’s okay to not be okay”. Because there’s no trick to the pain and you have your own way of grieving. It always finds you, either now or walking down a sunny street on a beautiful day
From what I understand which is not a reliable metric, the amount of headache your absence causes and how much visibility it has matters much more than the number. That’s what gets people to notice or chatter respectively. Nobody wants to do your work nor get flak from higher up.
But you should of course always avoid getting others sick as much as you can because that’s prime directive level cringe. So you might paint yourself into a corner indulging and then actually being sick.
My condolences, comrade. I wish there were better words to say or anything to hope for besides him winning the fight.
Minotaurs imply the existence minomaxxing and maxxotaurs
So I never saw Sinners, but if the movie explores that, and I don’t know how it does, then I think I’d side with not censoring it because of that. I think obviously someone goes up to the duo to explain and apologize and it seems that what the center of the controversy is. In my mind censoring-not censoring is secondary and the headline that centralizes the illness seems mortifying if I were in his shoes. I know “Half-hearted apology after awkward moment” isn’t good input for the outrage machine, but that’s what the situation should be. If someone on crutches fell onto the red carpet while you’re walking, you wouldn’t be like “you asshole!” This should be the kind of embarrassing that he should talk about in a stand up comedy routine, not blasting him into the news.
Seems a bit unproductive to do that if what you meant to do was show how racist you are. People might assume you have a disability and didn’t mean it.
You see, there’s a median voter somewhere in fucking Arizona or some such who really truly has a hard time deciding between the two candidates. Offering them healthcare, a union, or a safety net and the like are obviously no good because, regardless of relative price, if the invoice came from a government paper instead of a private company they’d fall into madness as if they saw the face of C’thulu xirself.
So when they wake up after watching reality TV until there’s 4 hours left to vote, they turn on the TV see two people groveling and crying, begging to for a chance to spill more blood, they choose the one who promises the least in return for causing unfathomable harm. Why? Because there were no subtitles during the super bowl halftime show.
Popular policies just aren’t realistic because the whole system is set up around that guy in Arizona
That one never cleanly resolved from what I understand. Both subfactions hate people for their inheritance, make no mistake. But some of them are like “I cba to participate in your clown society, enjoy your wife who you hate” and the others are like “it’s a good society but the clowns are in the way and influencing the cattle-people!” They want porn and hate porn respectively. The former is certainly not theory disciplined, the latter 99.9% of the time isn’t either. Both, as recent evidence shows, are derivative of Epstein for some reason.
But you’ll have a back and forth between the people who think you should be racist, jacked, innawoods with a virgin wife and the people who embody the smug pepe. They’ll argue about whether women are tools or agents essentially. Actually, as I type it out, I think that’s the core of the argument. “Are women making porn or are people making porn out of women?” and the conclusion sends them down the separate lanes of the same fucked up misogyny highway.