me ignoring all the good advice people have so I can drink mtn dew code reds and play online poker more

Imagine if they do bring his dumb ass back to life and every story, like Star Wars episode 9 where it’s like “they brought Palpetine?! Ugh!” turns out to be hyper realistic.

Then he legally endorses an AI as being just as capable as himself in speech and decision making and then future Republican candidates need only pledge fealty to the AI and further the eternal Trump agenda

I think it’s based to repurpose literal Nazi stuff with banal business. Is my opinion wrong and I’m bad for thinking so?

Tytyty

Happens to the best of us. But you just don’t have to do it again! You don’t have to keep contributing to cringe!

What’s the context behind this?

In a sentence or two I was just thinking about how my perspective is a little bit flattened and a little bit grim. I thought to myself “you know who’s good at talking about this shit? Dort Owl is always popping off about it in a way that resonates”

What does the author pun mean?

I think it was the Chapo boys who drew the comparison between King Charles II being giga inbred and people being upset that a dweeb was ruling over them only to find that the same concentration of power in capitalism fosters the same sort of dweebiness. If you mixed in some actual inbreeding again then history would be repeating itself.

Couldn’t they just get live Zionist seed? Would it be hard to come by?

Thought of and sought out this post. Thank you for making it

The combined effect is unambiguous. If a fertilised egg is legally a person under the state constitution, then abortion becomes first-degree murder. The defence-of-others clause, granting the right to deadly force, would then apply to anyone claiming to act on behalf of that fertilised egg.

Legal scholars and opponents of the bill have described this as an implicit authorisation of lethal vigilante action against anyone involved in a termination, including the woman herself, a doctor, or clinic staff.

The bill’s scope also extends beyond surgical abortion. Some forms of emergency contraception, such as Plan B and certain intrauterine devices, can prevent a fertilised egg from implanting in the uterus. Under this bill’s definition, that too would constitute first-degree murder.

A quick scan showed me the article is pretty good. Looks like that phrasing was setting up a paragraph about the opinions of legal experts.

I may be cringe, but at least I’ll never punch left for the most lethal military in response to a question about Palestine.

It has to be the exploitation of poverty. I cannot fathom someone, even someone pro-Israel, hell even an Israeli soldier giving enough of a shit about the cause to get ghost pregnant. The only audience I could possibly imagine are people who post on LinkedIn and provocative OnlyFans creators who would use the fallen hero marketing to get algorithmic attention.

As cringe as I have been and as cringe as I currently am at least I can say I am not you. That’s a comfort for me.

Getting ones name out there? Like just generating interest and conversation? My old reliable is to get a pair of boxing gloves, some mits, and let people punch the mits. You could even turn it into a labor trivia game where they get to punch for every question they get right. Give them a zine and say that you folks do fun activities. You could even put that on social media as short form content.

Critics argue it could lead to lethal vigilante actions against women and medical staff.

What do you mean argue? I literally don’t see any other interpretation. Even if you try to see it from the other point of view how else could you perceive this?

VAXXED?

Depending on who you ask, you’d come away thinking its ubiquitous. People pop all the time, for one thing. The UFC dropped USADA and instead went with some less standard testing when Connor McGregor was set to make a return. There was also a fun story about Nick Diaz vs Anderson Silva. Silva, known as a legendary unstoppable monster, ends up popping for PEDs, so Diaz was going to be declared the winner, but it turns out Diaz popped for weed. He was so hot that there was no way he wasn’t high during the fight.

I’m adjacent to everything, going so far as to have gotten the mythologized locker room talk about where to find stuff. I keep abreast of discussions about models, athletes, and actors. Even the movie Icarus comes to mind about government agencies overseeing doping programs.

As a rule of thumb 1) I think the world of muscle building can completely FUBAR a person’s understanding of what they can expect from natural lifting. 2) you can ask yourself simply: “does this person have a financial incentive to be strong/good looking?”

The idea that you can be afraid of building too much muscle is exclusively in the realm of endurance athletes, someone with a coach and nutritionist, or someone with a very particular and narrow band of self-image.

To that end, I would never be surprised to learn that an Olympic medalist of any stripe was using some kind of designer chemical that mirrors some androgenic effect of whatever testosterone byproduct. It’s probably a billion dollar industry and prohibition is simply ineffectual