That’s a Celeron right? I’d try a better AI model. Check this page for the list. You could try the heaviest one. It’ll take a long time to process your library but inference is faster. I don’t know how much faster it is. Maybe it would be fast enough to be usable. If not usable, choose a lighter model. There’s execution times in the table that I assume tell us how heavy the models are. Once you change a model, you have to let it rescan the library.
Yes, it depends on how you’re managing the service. If you’re using one of the common patterns via systemd, you may be cleaning up everything, including old volumes, like I do.
Check your Syncthing settings. It’s a very reliable piece of software. Other than that Immich, but that’s a slightly different use case.
Yes
A note on tires, turns out there’s another compatible “standard” for 451. It’s called OS20. From what I gather it’s 451 but with wider widths. There are a few models. I saw some Tioga, Kenda.
I switched to the same model. It’s absolutely spectacular. The only extra thing I did was to increase the concurrent job count for Smart Search and to give the model access to my GPU which sped up the initial scan at least an order of magnitude.
Oh, and if you haven’t changed from the default ML model, please do. The results are phenomenal. The default is nice but only really needed on really low power hardware. If you have a notebook/desktop class CPU and/or GPU with 6GB+ of RAM, you should try a larger model. I used the best model they have and it consumes around 4GB VRAM.
Yes. Of course what you said could happen. My point is that in the current status quo there’s still plenty of non-authoritarian countries and billionaires are still operating on easy-to-jump-ship basis when they destroy one democracy or another for increased profit. So I think that’s why this cost isn’t factored in. Competition for increased profits dominates. If we’re left with only a few democracies that tolerate billionaires, then that calculus could change. It’s similar to capitalism’s treatment of any finite resource - plunder that bitch till there’s nothing left, then deal with the consequences. If we don’t, the other guy would do it and we’d lose on the profit, and the other guy gains power over us given by the newly acquired capital.
Perfect. Given how unpopular the Democratic party is at the moment, this must have positive effect for Mamdani.
Probably not unless you have lots or animals crossing it. Ticks require hosts to feed and transport over significant distance I think.
Yes, of course.
Right but how do you make most countries want to arrest them? We currently don’t have a setup allowing for this if no international criminal offenses are involved. It only happens if the billionaire resides mostly in an “authoritarian” country where they could get “arbitrarily” arrested. The rest of the world isn’t currently setup to do this. I’m not saying it can’t be setup or shouldn’t be setup like that.
Smaller scale millionaires perhaps. Once they go multinational, it becomes very difficult to significantly harm them even if one country decides to dispossess their business. This has already happened to large corporations that exist today through nationalization at various places and points in time. E.g. Shell after Venezuelan oil nationalization.
Not if you have a loyal, competent police apparatus to round up anyone who dares to step out of line.
I think you thought you offended some folks with an endearing phrase. My whole life I have heard it used and I’ve used it myself as a synonym of “friend” or otherwise respectable reference to someone. Quick online check agrees.
Is the Suntour damped or just a spring?
The silver lining to stuff like this is that it’s now trivial to show examples of how the system works in favour of the 1%. In cases like this, the differential between profits and fines is so huge that anyone would understand how the fine is completely ineffective, and therefore regulation relying on such fines.
Did you run the Smart Search job?