• 1 Post
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • “We can disagree and still be friends” only works (and then it is a good sign of political culture) when both sides agree to respect each other as equal citizens and acknowledge to have the same rights. The “friend” relationship is generally perceived as an equal one - in this case it is implied, but might (depending on the context entirely) be anything but that.

    I don’t know where the pic from OP comes from, but I think it’s a pretty clever caption.


  • azan@lemmy.worldtoMemes@sopuli.xyzIf it ain't broke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yes, I mean it’s used for transactions in the programming sense of the word. Turns out financial transactions require that as well. I assume the same goes for nuclear stuff. There is just very little risk to come across uncertainties when the language is that old (and the people who use it hehe - tbf it pays super well).

    Edit: at least to my very limited knowledge












  • It’s important to think about the counterargument, I agree.

    To counter your counterargument: it’s not a good argument on many levels (scope, allocation, distribution mechanism, effect). The main reason is that this sort of charity doesn’t improve the core problem of low(er) social mobility. The opportunity to pursue self-development/self-fulfillment should not be tied to the whimsical act of a better-off person but presented to everyone as equal as possible - through common goods and services. The impossible future is impossible due to vastly different prerequisites. The person’s “greatness” will never be seen, as most likely they will never be presented with the opportunity to display it.