From my understanding brave is decent for privacy (not great. Just decent). It has a lot of issues though with the founder being a right wing supporter who has opposed human rights and had some covid opposition. It also has had issues like when you used the inbuilt tor system it leaked DNS queries making tor a little useless and ruined a lot of faith people had in them to make decent privacy software. It has also been very cryptocurrency forward. It also stole crypto from a few people through a “bug”. Basically it isnt that brave is currently proving they are a shit browser but there are several issues in the past and controversies that make most privacy focused people not trust it.

To wish you didnt remember making this wish

Unless the king is equivalent to the goalie in this situation in which case it would be offside

Partly because media focus bringing attention to the idea you can be trans. Partly because increasing acceptance. Not breast milk hormones

No. Trans people have always been around. The media and politicians just chose to focus on them lately

Pink Williams is actually one of those people for those who dont know. His style is very anti capitalist country music. “The Devil is Real” is all about how the real devil is the capitalists who take advantage of the common folk. And “Thank God For Gay Cowboys” is as the title suggests about gay cowboys and rednecks.

https://tacospin.com/

I’m a little confused by “open source isnt sustainable”. If you mean open source isn’t usually paid development so it is hard for you to live off any income from it I’d be inclined to agree. But there are still ways to turn a profit from open source development. I think red hat and even docker would serve as good examples. For red hat they provide open source code and sell a service while docker provides core open source components while has some features are closed source and paid.

As others have pointed out privacy without transparency (in the way of making the underlying code open source) isnt a guarantee of privacy its a weak promise at best. While I do think it is difficult to make open source as profitable as closed source, removing openness in its entirety isn’t a solution privacy focused people will accept.

As an example of a way to make money from this open source project: If you made the code open source and marketed towards companies where you could supply a secure communications network using a familiar interface and offered a license and support to them you’d still be able to make money without compromising the apps ability to create a meaningful network of privacy evangelists to vouch for you.

Unskilled labor isnt a real real thing. It was created to devalue blue collar workers. A construction worker is seen as unskilled but if you were to try and build a home next to a construction worker you’d realize how much skill they have at the matter.

The Wikipedia cites inconsistent airspeed data and miscommunication between the pilots but reading through the safety report from the crash that it cites for this it seems like it was mostly the pilots miscommunications and over corrections that caused issues. The auto pilot and auto thrust kicked off and the pilots scrambled to figure out what was up and did a few miss inputs there and then the plane started warning of a stall and they didnt properly address the stall conditions

Yes