A newly created open source project coded using AI would be fine if the creators could prove that they understand how to maintain the project and keep it going beyond the initially promoted code and that kind of proof can only come with time.

Prove to whom, and why? Who entitles anyone to demand “proof of investment” for a piece of work they have zero contribution to?

The big problem is the sheer volume of low quality projects that get abandoned will cause the projects that actually have potential to become needles in haystacks.

They already are. I don’t have numbers, but pretty sure the ratio between useful and useless repos on github is… Not high

We don’t need that in the Bay Area of Norway, Bergen, but thanks for suggesting

Oh yeah, the food crysis in the west is definitely not due to the loss of high quality fertilizers from the gulf and Russia.

IDEs like JetBrains use inotify to monitor filesystem changes

By this logic, the US, Australia and a lot of other countries should not exist. The real world is around you.

If I split my life into 4 chapters:

1. Phantasy star 4 - great story, a game way ahead of its time
2. WoW
3. Oxygen Not Included
4. Satisfactory

I’d cut nextcloud from that list