There is a data point missing here.
Do the same study and give some an LLM, some no LLM, and some a type A subject matter expert for reference. It may also matter if this person is a friend coworker or random passerby, but I would be willing to bet money that the same effect is present to a lesser (but still statistically significant) degree.
Maybe a future study can be further refined to build some scaffolding for more effective teaching/learning “on the job” or in general.
You and the guy you’re arguing with feel the same way.
One or both of you is wrong.
Has to do with the people at this point, not just the leader.
Turn the tables and LARP as an AI myself!
Aerospace systems. Have taught several classes of it already.
Pretty sure the infallibility part is only when he speaks “ex cathedra” which is a pretty narrow and specific time, but I’m not a Catholic.
A quick Google says the last time that was done was in 1950.
I play too much chess. I couldn’t figure out the first 4 words in the first 4 reads.
Bro, I eat half a tube of toothpaste a day for the health benefits. Have been doing that since I was 8.
Edit: /s for smooth brains
I think it depends which character you are.
GODDAMMIT I just opened this card for the promotional courage points!
You want the Ted like the stuffed animal? I guess that could work too.
That’s the whole point I’m making. A “proper coder” can leverage a model without turning it lose on a whole code base and saying “just fuck my shit up”.
You write the logic for a panel and you need to add a centered button in a UI? Done. You need to grab the proper tar flags for data repackage and transport? Done. You need to actually devise a scalable framework for an finite state machine capturing failure modes? Hooray, you now have time to just focus on that, it’s a bad use case for a LLM. This is what you pay real people for.
All laying the ground work for future endeavors which hopefully address those shortcomings. The box is open and it’s unlikely to close, but I agree these models can’t continue to suck as much as they do to make in the long term and be viable without changes.
Even more unpopular: beyond a certain skill level AI starts to look like a feature again too.
But it’s windows so there’s no saving that turd no matter how much you polish it at this point.
Tedpool - like Bill and Ted.
🤷 it got you talking didn’t it?
It’s like that sometimes 🤷
Have you ever talked to anyone in “healthcare support” over the phone? That shit could be improved by switching 100% to AI right now. It’s a revolving door of people who don’t want or understand the job and don’t give one quarter of one shit about it. We could improve central scheduling overnight, at least AI might pretend to look at provider notes.
You cant say that on Lemmy! You’ll be banned for EleCtOrALiSM!
This will then injure the feelies of every lefty waiting on their couch for door dash to bring them a politician they really super like, but can’t contribute to finding. That, of course, cannot stand.
Edit: We should also note that this type of behavior may summon at least one teenage European to sagely say “every American is complicit!” in a way that is most helpful.