• 2.58K Posts
  • 3.16K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • Nah, taxpayer funded institutions shouldn’t just be able to say any group they don’t like is inappropriate and ban them with zero process and University students do have a first amendment right to assemble themselves

    This Republican group should be banned because they’re a discriminatory group of bigots who make the environment unsafe for other students and violate civil rights laws, but what this dipshit university (which let this nazi club carry on for years until they made headlines and is actually now just trying to make a new college Republicans chapter, which is a whole other 1st amendment violation) thinks is “appropriate” should have absolutely nothing to do with it


  • A pattern which would repeat in 1980, 2016, and 2024

    Yep, and so many of the same people were involved in each of them, and every single one should have been in prison or executed.

    tbf, knowing my countrymen… they probably would.

    I agree with everything else, but I’m not so sure about this. I think if we had said “This is treason” and treated it like what the average American thinks a treason/coup scenario would look like (dramatic and violent, like a tv show where the president is played by Harrison Ford or Kiefer Sutherland) and used whatever force was necessary to put people in jail immediately most Americans would have rallied 'round the flag.

    Either way, yeah we definitely should have rolled the dice on it.












  • Furthermore, Miguez’s campaign responded to the Guardian’s list of questions about the police report by providing a 24 February email sent by the accuser’s father to the state senator’s office, which had the sentence: “Everything my daughter has reported about you were lies and she is a liar and has a drug problem.”

    The email doesn’t elaborate on precisely how the author knows his daughter told lies, and he didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. But Miguez’s campaign said in a statement: “The woman’s father gave permission to share this email with you.”

    This is like the most abuser coded series of actions and statements short of actually assaulting someone I can imagine





  • Masturbating I get, becoming addicted to something you enjoy I get, using a third party app to try to break your addiction seems dumb but I get how desperation can make you dumb

    What I absolutely can’t get is what anyone could productively do with this data. Like, I don’t even think blackmailing someone with this could work. The worst you could say about someone with it is that they had a porn habit they didn’t like and were trying to change it, and anyone rational is just gonna say “I don’t see what’s the big deal with watching porn, but good on you for attempting some kind of self improvement I guess.”