Tox is interesting, though potentially less secure than Briar as they rolled their own encryption and have not been audited (afaik).

Or glue. Glue would be hilarious.

Neither do I. I use Mullvad Browser, which is based on Firefox.

Brave has its own content blocking system, which is on-par with uBO and better than uBO Lite. I tested it myself a while back, and Cover Your Tracks, Fingerprint.com, and CreepJS indicated that it was incredibly difficult to fingerprint: moreso than Librewolf, but slightly less so than Tor/Mullvad.

That said, however, PrivacyTests.org indicates that Librewolf blocks more tracking technologies than Brave, so it’s possible things have changed since I last experimented with browsers other than Tor and Mullvad.

Well, it does do a fantastic job of removing ads and reducing fingerprinting.

They are a provider as well as a client now.

Where is this? Asking for a friend.

(Actually, though, where is it?)

I was watching Jam the other day, and that honestly seemed better and more rational than reality. South Park has been a documentary for a long time.

Nope! There used to be a login screen available for BeOS, but Haiku doesn’t have this. As for disk encryption, I imagine it’ll be a long time before someone ports cryptsetup or anything like that.

Well, it requires that my machines have disk encryption and a password, for one thing.

Whoa, that looks lovely!

I can’t wait for the day when Haiku is secure enough for my threat model. It seems so calm and old-school, and yet both powerful and modern.

The cost of the ingredients. Nothing more. I would be doing this for fun, after all.

I would do this fr

You know what? Just because of this, I’m going to switch back to DuckDuckGo.

Every 4get instance uses it as a backend anyway.

A similar story from 2021: https://www.businessinsider.com/uk-man-wwii-shell-lodged-in-rectum-bomb-squad-called-2021-12

Yeetus foetus

Womp womp