Ethnic Cleansing (also known as Ethnic Cleansing: The Game) is a 2002 first-person shooter game developed by the National Alliance, an American white supremacist and neo-Nazi organization. The player controls one of three selectable characters, including a Ku Klux Klan member and a neo-Nazi skinhead, and traverses two levels to kill stereotypically depicted African Americans, Latinos, and Jews. Designed to be politically incorrect and spread a white supremacist message, the game was released through the National Alliance’s record label, Resistance Records, on Martin Luther King Jr. Day 2002.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_Cleansing_(video_game)

Huh. Where’d you even hear about this game?

I can’t promise it’s not malware, but it looks like it’s available on a site called gamejolt as well as the internet archive.

Also, those were literally the first three results when I searched “ethnic cleansing game” so I’m really curious what you were doing to search for it.

Maybe not, but it’s still pretty cool.

We launched attacks on Iran to distract from the Epstein files, leading to the closure of the strait of Hormuz and dwindling oil reserves around the world. It was only like 3 months ago, I’m surprised you didn’t hear about this

To be fair, that’s kind of a dumb name for a city. New York should be the only state getting away with that kind of naming convention.

Did you also stand by them when they started using AI images in the store? Or when they started that patrons thing where they just ask you to donate to a for-profit store?

GOG has been kind of weird lately, and I can’t say I like what I’ve been seeing.

And you’re just going to trust us to find the video ourselves?

this account aligns with our current understanding.”

ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT ACTUALLY WITNESS ANY LARGE SCALE SHOOTINGS ON THE SQUARE PROPER, GALLO SAW MANY CASUALTIES BROUGHT INTO THE SQUARE AND DID NOT DOUBT THAT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE IN BEIJING WERE KILLED BY THE ARMY ON JUNE 3 AND 4.

I guess we can agree that many people, probably hundreds, were killed.

The “massacre” narrative is that “big bad even Chinaman gunned down innocent children for no reason other than their undying love of democracy!@!@3!!”

That’s not something I, or anyone else here has said. Stop inventing strawmen.

Are you aware that videos are made up of many images shown in sequence to give the illusion of motion?

That’s not the claim made by the propagandaist Jeff whatever the fuck. He claims he took a photograph, and was given awards based on his photograph.

Again, you know that videos are made up of many images, right?

And you know that more than one person recorded the moment, right?

Five photographers managed to capture the event on film.[3] On June 4, 2009, the fifth photographer released an image of the scene taken from ground level.[42]

In addition to the still photography, video footage of the scene was recorded and transmitted across the globe. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) cameraman Willie Phua, CNN cameraman Jonathan Schaer and National Broadcasting Company (NBC) cameraman Tony Wasserman appear to be the only television cameramen who captured the scene.[49][50][51] The ABC correspondents Max Uechtritz and Peter Cave were the journalists reporting from the balcony.[52]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man

But it is the opinion of the US STATE DEPARTMENT that the “massacre” did not happen.

SUMMARY DURING A RECENT MEETING, A LATIN AMERICAN DIPLOMAT AND HIS WIFE PROVIDED POLOFF AN ACCOUNT OF THEIR MOVEMENTS ON JUNE 3-4 AND THEIR EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT OF EVENTS AT TIANANMEN SQUARE.

1. That’s not the state department saying there was not massacre, it’s an account provided by a Chilean diplomat.

ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT ACTUALLY WITNESS ANY LARGE SCALE SHOOTINGS ON THE SQUARE PROPER, GALLO SAW MANY CASUALTIES BROUGHT INTO THE SQUARE AND DID NOT DOUBT THAT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE IN BEIJING WERE KILLED BY THE ARMY ON JUNE 3 AND 4.

2. They don’t deny that a massacre occurred, they just say it didn’t take place directly in the square

BODIES AND WOUNDED, HOWEVER, BEGAN TO ARRIVE AT THE RED CROSS STATION INDICATING THE EXTENT OF THE FIGHTING AND THE FACT THAT REAL BULLETS WERE BEING USED. AS THE MILITARY BEGAN TO REACH THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE SQUARE AND SHOTS WERE FIRED IN THE VICINITY OF THE RED CROSS STATION, MRS. GALLO DECIDED SHE WANTED TO LEAVE.

3. They still say there were many dead and wounded, although they don’t give a number for either.

There is no ‘tank man’ photo, it’s a video,

Are you aware that videos are made up of many images shown in sequence to give the illusion of motion?

where more then 1000 partygoers where vaporized by advanced unknown alien technology.

You’ve got to be joking, right?

Also, I found an hilarious article from 2009

So no one here in this thread, and no one in the past 16 years. Sure. I guess obsessing over a 17 year old correction is good and healthy behavior, especially when you pretend that the statements from before the correction are still what everyone’s saying.

So which one is it? Is it the Tiananmen Square massacre or the “something to the west somewhere massacre idk”?

Alright, so you really are just upset about the name.

It’s not me who talks about machine gun fire and tank shells with thousands of casualties.

Who else brought them up, and where? It’s not in the article this post is about or any of the comments I’ve seen except yours.

where are the thousands and thousands of students massacred by relentless machine gun fire and tank shells?

INITIALLY NOT MUCH WAS HAPPENING IN THE SQUARE AS MOST OF THE FIGHTING WAS TAKING PLACE TO THE WEST

Presumably to the west, where most of the fighting was happening. I think there was something about the Liubukou junction (NSFW)?

But anyways, I don’t think anyone is giving an actual number of dead beyond “hundreds or thousands”. Asking about the “thousands and thousands of students” is already disingenuous. Bringing up “relentless machine gun fire and tank shells” even more so.

ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT ACTUALLY WITNESS ANY LARGE SCALE SHOOTINGS ON THE SQUARE PROPER, GALLO SAW MANY CASUALTIES BROUGHT INTO THE SQUARE AND DID NOT DOUBT THAT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE IN BEIJING WERE KILLED BY THE ARMY ON JUNE 3 AND 4.

The part you seem to be ignoring. Are you just upset about the name implying people died in the square?

6. THE GALLOS POSITIONED THEMSELVES NEAR THE RED CROSS STATION AT THE FOOT OF THE STEPS TO THE MUSEUM. INITIALLY NOT MUCH WAS HAPPENING IN THE SQUARE AS MOST OF THE FIGHTING WAS TAKING PLACE TO THE WEST. BODIES AND WOUNDED, HOWEVER, BEGAN TO ARRIVE AT THE RED CROSS STATION INDICATING THE EXTENT OF THE FIGHTING AND THE FACT THAT REAL BULLETS WERE BEING USED.

11. LATER THE MORNING OF JUNE 4, GALLO AND HIS WIFE MADE THEIR WAY BACK TO THE SQUARE, AGAIN VIA THE ALLEY TO THE SOUTH OF THE MUSEUM OF THE REVOLUTION. HE SAID THAT FOR NO APPARENT REASON THAT ALLEY WAS THE ONLY ONE NOT SEALED OFF. FROM THE ALLEY THEY SAW TROOPS CLEARING THE SQUARE PILING UP LARGE PLASTIC BAGS AND DRAGGING THEM TO HELICOPTERS. THEY COULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THE BAGS CONTAINED REFUSE OR BODIES. AT THE TIME, THEY SAID, THEY COULD NOT IMAGINE THE BAGS CONTAINED BODIES AND HAD ASSUMED IT WAS GARBAGE. ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT ACTUALLY WITNESS ANY LARGE SCALE SHOOTINGS ON THE SQUARE PROPER, GALLO SAW MANY CASUALTIES BROUGHT INTO THE SQUARE AND DID NOT DOUBT THAT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE IN BEIJING WERE KILLED BY THE ARMY ON JUNE 3 AND 4.

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html

Said proof from the US embassy if anyone was curious.

I thought there might be some joke I wasn’t getting related to what a “genuis” is, but I’m pretty sure it was just a spelling error.

You might be surprised, unless you exclusively play multiplayer games with anti-cheat.

What they don’t have is the store part - you can’t actually BUY games from those tools.

Heroic does let you buy games through the app, but it seems like it’s just a browser that gives heroic an affiliate link when you make the purchase.

I know New Zealanders always say yes because it’s rude to say no even though they already knew they’re not coming.

Isn’t that more rude? To get someone’s hopes up, have them prepare for your arrival, then to disappoint them for seemingly no reason?

The Volusia County Sheriff’s Office says a 2-year-old girl was hit by a car after running into a traffic lane on the beach about 4:30 p.m. Saturday in New Smyrna Beach, Florida.

How is there a traffic lane on the beach? Who did this? How does this happen?

we need to stop coddling pedestrians drivers because they’re too unwilling to be safe when they cross drive.

Why are you trying to put all the responsibility on pedestrians, people out walking, instead of drivers, who need to pass a driving test and need a driver’s license in order to operate their multiple tons of machinery in public places? What’s the point of it all if not making drivers more responsible for their actions?

A better solution would just be to strip the right of way from pedestrians

Further addressing the issue would mean putting in additional crosswalks to prevent jay-walking and unsafe crossings, as would improved public transit.

How would that help? If pedestrians don’t have the right of way, why does it matter if they’re in the crosswalk or not? It’s not like they’d be any more protected from the speeding cars that are no longer obligated to stop for them just because there’s some paint on the ground.

If we’re so hellbent on speeding drivers, maybe we should also start ticketing people who walk faster than most on the sidewalk too?

If that person could kill or maim someone by walking into them, then maybe. As it is, cars have the highest potential for damage and loss of life, so they should have the most rules restricting them.

everybody would get their panties in a bunch over that too because of this stupid selfish mentality that people have

How is this not exactly what you’re doing right now about cars not being able to speed without punishment?

I’m saying it’s the car drivers that need “proper responsibility” put on them. If they don’t have the right of way, they need to yield. Just because a car will kill a pedestrian in a collision doesn’t mean the pedestrian needs to be more responsible and should have more rules and regulations governing them. In fact, killing pedestrians so easily is exactly why there need to be more rules and regulations for driving a car.

Those two lines I quoted from you are a contradiction. If pedestrians have the right of way, then they’re doing everything they’re legally responsible for in an interaction. Just because the law doesn’t protect you from careless drivers doesn’t mean that the pedestrian is suddenly responsible for the consequences.