

Already happened with Cerebras and they landed at a stable 2x of the open. SpaceX is probably going to be next & set the real standard
Expert developer, Buddhist


Already happened with Cerebras and they landed at a stable 2x of the open. SpaceX is probably going to be next & set the real standard


Print it out into a series of QR codes on cards, and then store it in a binder with your old pokemon cards. Make sure to draw a pentagram in smeared ash somewhere so that it’s demon proof


Thanks mr brave wand!
oh no they only have 3.5 billion users how will meta ever survive, their ability to take on debt must mean they are seen as unable to pay debts
What I’m saying is that’s actually very hard unless you run a super sterile account on purpose. Even just your writing style is a pretty good fingerprint. Your IP. Any pictures you’ve posted. It’s a rough world out there for privacy
It’s not that hard to identify people online. My account is definitely not private
It’s occasionally worth calling out that votes are also public. I think twice before hitting those buttons
I’d say there isn’t a difference here, which is why they are both on the right side in the chart. The survey probably just had that option to appease people who have the opinion “but that’s it’s not a matter of morality at all!”


Just use pacman, it’s fine, and less fiddly than manually installing a binary to your PATH


Haha yeah college in Quebec is free for Canadians so I mean, not a bad idea
There’s only one great choice and that’s CLRS (“intro to algorithms”) - if you know this book & did the exercises, you can just skip college


Well how you gonna buy a new Mac if you could get security patches for your old device


Windows now Chromebooks?
Literally anywhere on Google. But it also makes sense when you think about ChromeOS & non-us aligned countries - what else are they gonna use?
HEY BUT DO YOU WANT TO USE A PASSCODE?? PASSCODE! PASSCODE! USE THE PASSCODE! -_-



I don’t get it, it’s just a markdown file, which is how llm specs already get written. I’m supposed to trust that the llm will “compile” it correctly every time without touching the code output? What happens when the code gets huge and complex, a “recompile” entails waiting for ages to get something similar to what others compiled? What am I missing?
Weights training can be overly specific to individual muscles. And heavy weights have more intertia in general. So the solutions are: