

I guess the “end the drug wars and stop the attacks on communities of colour” politics that I assume many harm reduction activists had in 00s/10s California wouldn’t gibe well with the “I am rich and smart and I will never die so I should be allowed to do whatever I want” politics of TESCREAL.
I’ve never been a drug user but my impression is that like safer sex education, harm reduction education is actually more likely to turn people off using drugs than encourage them to try it. Like, check out this page about amphetamine harm reduction, which mentions that taking it might affect your immune system, damage your heart, cause psychosis and trigger mental health problems and cause malnutrition. Doesn’t exactly make it seem attractive!





I’m not sure I understand what you mean by this:
Could you explain?