• 842 Posts
  • 2.06K Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2019

help-circle



  • All things have a class character. In the PRC, surveillance is used to keep the people and the streets very safe. In the US or UK for example, surveillance is used to protect the property of the rich, and imprison poorer peoples. The only reason for skepticism, is because people see how these things are used against the people in the west, and not for them.

    You can walk around in nearly any city in the PRC and feel completely safe, and the cameras are definitely a part of that. You can watch videos on youtube with westerners walking around at night in any given city in the PRC, and they’re stunned at how safe it is. Even from a liberal perspective, security and personal safety is liberty / freedom. From a proletarian perspective, its a very non-intrusive way to prevent street crime on a mass scale and make sure cities stay walkable and safe.




  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mltoChapotraphouse@hexbear.netDamn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    Nixon was a bit of an outsider in D.C. He wasn’t Ivy League, he had had a less prestigious upbringing, which gave him a mentality of loathing the rich kids - in part because the rich kids were dicks to him due to him being “poor” (he wasn’t, but in their eyes). The CIA at this time was a real old-money blueblood boys club. All yachters.

    This doesn’t track with anything I’ve read. I recently finished that biography of Allen Dulles - The devil’s chessboard. Nixon, despite initially being a DC / georgetown outsider, did prove his loyalty to them, especially during the Alger Hiss case. The OSS/CIA supported his initial political rise through one of the m, and over the years he gained acceptance to that circle. Nixon was one of Allen Dulles’ / the CIA’s main political assets.

    And they had fucked over Nixon before, during his campaign against Kennedy.

    Never heard this one, but the CIA tried their best to elect him there. He lost to Kennedy by less than a percentage point.




  • There are a lot of cities that fit that description, but being the US, you’re not going to find a lot of good options that have a decent overall quality of life, and aren’t incredibly expensive.

    The best metrics to look for IMO are:

    • Bikability
    • Usable public transportation (< 10 US cities have this)
    • Good infrastructure / livability
    • Green spaces / parks

    That leaves only a few options, all of which are expensive, but still far better than any other alternative:

    My top picks are:

    • San Francisco / bay area
    • Washington DC area
    • Boston area
    • Seattle area

    I’ve lived in many of these places and can vouch for them.

    I personally hate these below, because they’re grimy / filthy, have a ton of cops, and are filled with podcasters, but they do have good public transportation and a few other redeemable things.

    • NYC area
    • Chicago area
    • Philadelphia area