• 26 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 25th, 2021

help-circle
  • pancake@lemmy.mlOPtoNoFap@lemmy.mlI hope this community takes off
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, NoFap is against the porn industry, which is why I used to believe its spread would be beneficial, but there is a large part of the community that expresses very clearly misogynistic or pseudoscientific views, and I no longer think it’s feasible to reform NoFap in any way to overcome this, other than the unlikely case that they make clear those are not welcome in their community.













  • You don’t think a US-dominated unipolar world is a threat to socialism worldwide and must fall? And why don’t you think that?

    Edit 2: sorry, I realize my mistake. “I see it’s what you guys defend too” would have been a better wording, otherwise I imply that you are among the “even socialists” mentioned at the start.

    Edit 1: Nvm I’ve been called a tankie on another instance, now this. Maybe I’m acting weird, that’s all, I’ll take good care of my health for a few days and come back. It would help me if you explained yourselves, but I understand if you don’t.


  • Well, I see lots of people (even socialists) that think that the path taken by the ship is good, it just needs socialism or whatever. Of course, my stance is that this path doesn’t lead to socialism and a violent change of world order is necessary before it can achieved. Which might be true or false, but I see it’s what you guys defend (edit: to clarify, you guys defend the same position as me, “my stance”, not the first one I mentioned, “I see lots of people”).


  • pancake@lemmy.mltoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, my answer is pretty removed, but I’d say I’d like a system where decisions are made by submitting automated proofs of their optimality, either absolute or over all submitted proposals in a defined time frame. The conditions of optimality would be pre-defined in a Constitution, and non-provable facts would be accepted or rejected via a decentralized voting system that would keep multiple diff chains and penalize e.g. voting for facts that are later proven false via a submitted proof. The proof system would hold all powers, but would be able to delegate decisions to entities under proven rules, which would come faster but possibly be overriden.