quarrk [he/him]

  • 312 Posts
  • 3.35K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 30th, 2022

help-circle


  • To solve this you have to abolish capitalism. We can quibble over the need to pathologize Americans, but the important point is that this so-called pathology simply reflects the logic of value production and capitalism more broadly.

    Capitalism is essentially the production of surplus-value. This can never ever change so long as we have capitalism. Degrowth is incompatible with the requirement to expand value. Our relationship with nature is extremely fucked (obviously) and the only way to fix that is with careful, conscious management and wind-down of the global economy. That is possible only in a society capable of conscious and planned economy, an economy designed for production of use-value instead of value, and that necessarily means socialism.

    It should also not be forgotten that the world economy is predicated on the US as a major consumer of the exports which other countries, including China, rely upon to drive their own economies. Making matters worse is not only must all countries increase value over time, they need much of that value in the form of US Dollars. The world economy is not ready for a disruption in the flow of US Dollars.






  • For example https://protesilaos.com/books/2020-09-30-ethos-dialectic/

    The Dialectician’s Ethos

    2020-09-30

    Dialectic is an inter-personal experience: a rigorous dialogical process where parties to an argument exchange views in pursuit of the common objective of approximating the truth. Socrates used the dialectical method in this exact way: a certain kind of targeted conversation.

    To effectively and consistently partake in dialectic, one must have developed several virtues.

    They must be honest. To stand by their arguments, recognise any possible mistake of theirs, not misrepresent the other side’s positions, not employ rhetorical tricks, not assume malevolence in the opposing side’s propositions or act in bad faith, and the like.

    You can see how he embodies this honesty in practice /s






  • Along with what @infuziSporg@hexbear.net said, in my opinion term limits are not the solution to this problem. If the same person is elected for a really long time, then your org is not doing enough to train up the next generation. But if presented with that problem, it doesn’t really help to be forced into electing someone less competent just for bureaucratic reasons. In my opinion. It’s attaining the symptom instead of the cause, in a way that could be harmful.

    A thriving org that nurtures new leadership will not have a problem of finding people willing and able to take over periodically

    I guess term limits would help with one situation: when Betty from accounting wants to be the Forever Treasurer and will be deeply offended if someone else takes that role. But actually solving that requires org discipline and the strength to tell her that she can’t do that. Using term limits is the passive/avoidant solution in that scenario.