I don’t think invasive data collection via black boxes is the way to go. I’d say better driver education, speed traps, and better education for civil servants (such as traffic cops) might be a better solution.

What really bothers me is that he just had to light what I assume is a joint on the poster. Does this guy have any other personality trait, or is it just being involved with weed?

Additional data about your driving behavior is also collected, completely unrelated to cameras. In fact, this data is the majority.

Jesus Christ.

Wiesnkoks wurde natuerlich erfunden, um einfach auf dem Oktoberfest ungestoert koksen zu koennen. Eigentlich so dreist wie genial. Ich ziehe meinen lustigen Hut.

I mean, at that point, don’t discuss it in text, but use a scheduling tool that forces people into a framework. If they refuse, they’re just being a dick, but at that point, at least it’s obvious they’re fucking around.

It also happens to be incredibly bad.

There certainly would be a market for a network camera ecosystem provided by a company that people can trust. I don’t think it has to be all or nothing, plenty of people really are in no position to self-host.

I’m not sure if there is anything out there that regular consumers currently could migrate to in case they want to get away from questionable companies. There are completely local systems (local recorder, no remote access), but those are lacking the home automation features / notifications, and well-respected brands that have been around (let’s say, Axis?) that are still closed source, not cross-platform and with pricing often not aimed at end customers.

I didn’t check out this project, so I’m certainly not saying this is it and there habe been various criticism of this particular project here, but I’d love if a decent project would emerge in the space.

Would you consider using a managed cloud solution + app if it’s open-source and properly end-to-end encrypted? How would a hypothetical company have to behave to be trustworthy, while still being allowed to profit? People here seem to like e. g. tuta.io for encrypted mail, I don’t see why a similar model could not work for network cameras.

These are genuine questions btw., I myself am really annoyed at the status quo with its data breaches, blatant lies to customers about encryption, and corporations willfully cooperating with fascist governments by proactively providing video data. I’m not even going to talk about AI training.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rüdesheim_am_Rhein_and_the_Rhine_river.jpg

So apparently, this is near Ruedesheim.

😂👌

This is nonsense. The documentation is readily available, and it takes arguably less time to provide the code to write a single, proper file than to create 50 desktop entries.

This is just ignorance on whoever wrote that part of Krita.

Simply search for food coloring pens. Patisserie shops sell them, and so does Amazon, but I wouldn’t draw on a kid’s banana with a random pen ordered off of Amazon, unless it’s a reputable brand.

I’d probably set up some firewall rules / a VLAN to isolate the cameras. I generally don’t trust any company to do the reasonable thing, and apparently, these days, we live in a world where many companies are outright malicious.

You can trust them about this much:

https://www.theverge.com/23573362/anker-eufy-security-camera-answers-encryption

That’s fine for simple work, but soldering can absolutely benefit from a temperature controller. That’s either a simple analog controller, or a microcontroller that has a display, menu, and consecutively, firmware. There is nothing complicated or “eccentric” about that in case of a soldering iron.

I’d even argue it’s the same with the device in the original post. I get it’s a joke, but let’s face it, that’s not simply a kitchen knife.

Now if anyone can tell me why the fume hood in my kitchen is wifi - enabled… I never hooked that up, obviously, and all I can think of would be push notifications in case of an upcoming filter change, you know, the thing that could be implemented with a simple LED for 4ct.

All while constantly scratching your butt due to the worms. Ah, Rome.

Just because I already answered that a few days ago: yes, it was/is absolutely very explicit pictures of the artist.

As others have said, there is an “HD” button in the upper right corner which does what you want. It is always there, even if the background of the image obscures it.

There is also an option in “Advanced–>Media” that makes this behavior the default. You can also check if the data saver options for mobile and wifi are enabled.

No, they’re right. Pizzacake does have a very explicit OnlyFans.

I actually think Reddot does not, even though their comic strips feature more sexual topics overall.

I’d never have expected Jenny to let herself go like that.