Usa drops kids off at pool, the dutch stack shelves.

It really is pretty horrific for bikes and pedestrians, no clue wtf its sooo expensive ngl.

I agree, it did try and spin it that way. But I lived in the inner west (with young kids) and safety to me on a bike seems simply impossible there.

As someone from sydney this is Sheer maddness. Sydney must be the most if not one of the most unsafe place on earth to ride a bike e or not, let alone one with unprotected small children. Sydney hates bike riders, the roads are hostile there are almost zero safe bike lanes.

Additionally you are exposing your kids to god knows how much vehicle exhaust fumes, right in their faces, sydney also has FA EV cars too.

I use it to study med. If anyone wants a fun way to memorise cancer treatments here you go. I find ai songs for study extremly useful.

https://suno.com/playlist/b0722434-83a3-45db-a874-9edff53013bc

yes but right is all evil

Why would you actively want evil?

Why did they drop singing l wonder

100% a dan

Are you suggesting with say…an amendment?

70! we would all be dead!

Won’t somebody think of the economy!

Solar panels do not have a positive CO2 footprint in the sense that they are net emitters of CO2. While the production of solar panels generates CO2 emissions, studies have shown that the overall carbon footprint of solar panels is significantly lower than that of traditional fossil fuel-based energy sources.

A life-cycle assessment of solar panels found that the carbon footprint of solar panels is approximately 20-50 grams of CO2-equivalent per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity generated . In contrast, the carbon footprint of coal-fired power plants is around 1,000 grams of CO2-equivalent per kWh .

Research suggests that solar panels can offset their life-cycle emissions within 2-4 years of operation, and can generate clean energy for decades beyond that . A study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology found that the net carbon emissions savings from solar panels can be up to 78% compared to traditional fossil fuel-based energy sources.

hardly slighty less shit id say.

References:

Fthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2011). Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of solar panels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3521-3533.

IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Reich, N. H., & Alsema, E. A. (2017). Environmental impacts of solar energy systems. In Solar Energy Engineering (pp. 255-274). Academic Press.

Perez, M. J. R., Fthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2019). Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and net energy analysis of solar panels. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(11), 6453-6462.

We already know, its not learning. Its caring, and we dont. Greed > Caring

Accurate

universal health cover is also realtively simple too…

Last poll I saw he wasnt ahead…

Nice

The irony of the machines powered by diesil burrying wood…

Ew I. Accidently clicked on a twitter link I ieel so dirty