Why would you care what anyone chooses to eat?

I guess it helps that the left frame is filmed with a potato.

owning weapons to protect oneself and one’s fellow human beings is absolutely justifiable, but the uncontrolled acquisition and loose carrying regulations in public spaces are definitely not.

This incident in France proved that strict regulations only affect law abiding citizens. Having one “side” disarmed might prevent escalation but it also strips them - but not the others - of the possibility to exercise their right to defend themselves.

That would be ideal, but the different social securities make it economically impossible.

Lol does it matter or are you just curious?

Well yes. I have a cold and can’t think but I mean inflation makes the price go the other way.

I agree, it’s only natural a house would decrease in value after it’s been built. Just like cars or anything else. You could mitigate that by renovating etc of course.

It’s about voluntary redistribution by trading, gifting, and donating, rather than having someone forcefully redistribute your assets how they see fit.