I suppose my first comment could be read as a patronising one. Sorry for that, it was definately not my intention.

I’m not sure if your depiction is accurate, but thank you for clarifying. I assumed what you wrote was your reaction to the article.

Maybe you found yourself in the wrong community? In the sense that this is an article about antidepressants, in a community about antidepressants.

In relation to this article I thought of adding a few links:

• ACADEMIC BOYCOTT - BDS

• Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Palestine Solidarity Campaign

In 1968 Hebrew University of Jerusalem illegally acquired a significant portion of the land on which its Mount Scopus campus and dormitories are built.

This land is part of East Jerusalem, which is under illegal occupation according to international law. Hebrew University also hosts the Israeli military’s Havatzalot program, effectively a military base on campus that includes combat training.

Good luck with this. Keep us posted

The way I see things no nuclear facility should ever be bombed. Never.

I also think that the Israeli attacks are related to Iran’s nuclear program but I don’t think they are related to this alleged leak. Here is a 25 min long al jazeera podcast for more on this:

Why is Israel attacking Iran now?

Thank you for your input. Even tho I find this to be totally faisable, from what the cradle article provides, I cannot verify much:

• fars looks like it’s an Iranian outlet I personnaly don’t know if I can trust or not, regardless of mbfc
• the informed sources are not named
• I didn’t manage to find the documents mentionned*

Apart from that at some point it mentions that Grossi said in Times of Israel that “We have seen some reports in the press. We haven’t had any official communication about this.”, but it is about Iran stealing Israeli documents.

Anyways, if you or anyone has more on this, please share.

Edit: *I mean deducted, or something

I’m a bit confused because the title claims that windfarms are habitats, and in the article itself it says:

“We’re trying to understand whether these animals are actually using the wind farms as habitat, or whether they’re being displaced by them,” says Annemiek Hermans, PhD candidate at Wageningen University & Research.

Great points you made there.

I don’t know much about the bacteria that could develop in stagnant water but it certainly sounds like something to keep an eye out in relation to how this project evolves.

And I edited the title to include the no electricity part you mentionned.

Here is a very interesting story about baboons in less than 4 minutes.

Dr Robert Sapolsky and the Keekorok Baboon Troop

I have noticed that The Conversation has articles that I consider to be great and others that I find to be the opposite. Unfortunately, for me, this one is in the later category.

In this one, mainly they talk about how the technologies will work, about money and the urgency to use this tech. The real urgency is to start phasing out fossil fuel globally. Also, they don’t talk about the unintended consequences, the too many known unknowns, and let’s keep in mind there are uncountable unknown unknowns in geoengineering.

More info:

• Key reasons to oppose geoengineering | Geoengineering Monitor
• [email protected]

I find the following part to be very illuminating

Yet a million tonnes – or even the full 28 million tonnes that have been purchased to date – is negligible in terms of impact on the climate. At current emissions levels, removing a million tonnes is like undoing 13 minutes out of a full year of emissions,

Coincidentaly, I also posted this article but after reading it a second time, I decided to delete it because I found it was very problematic since it says very contradictory things. If I misunderstood something, please point it out to me.

Examples of contradictions:

Over 99% of the almost 1.89m tCO2e estimated […] is attributed to Israel’s aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.

[…] 50% [of CO2e emissions] were generated by the supply and use of weapons, tanks and other ordnance by the Israeli military (IDF), the study found.

• And there is this graph claiming that most emissions by sector come from Gaza aid delivery (trucks).

According to this article, it looks like most emissions come from Israel’s IDF

Over 99% of the almost 1.89m tCO2e estimated to have been generated between the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack and the temporary ceasefire in January 2025 is attributed to Israel’s aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.

I would say, it’s much longer than 40 years.

This is what the United Nations, use as starting point:

1917 – 1947: British mandate

Palestine was among former Ottoman territories placed under UK administration by the League of Nations in 1922. All of these territories eventually became fully independent States, except Palestine, […]

Please, stop using the tactic of whataboutism. Meaning, this paper is specifically about Israel’s war on Palestine, so let’s talk about this post, and not everything else instead.

Edit: I need to correct my comment, since this paper is about

• Israel - Palestine
• Israel - Iran
• Israel - Lebanon
• Israel - Yemen

Not too sure I understand what you mean. Needs a published paper first, for what?

This is about a congress. For some reason, I wouldn’t be surprised if a scientist could present early findings of their research in a scientific gathering, meaning before publishing a paper. Just to be clear, I really don’t know what are the general or specific rules in order to participate in a congress, a conference etc, so please correct me if my assumption is wrong.

I don’t see any bickering over who has it worst.

I see a need for active solidarity and inclusion, because oppressions intersect.

Note: I don’t agree with the tone of this article, because it portrays mining companies as ok (i.e. Many mines are proactively embracing these standards). Still, I find it has interesting points, so I thought it was worth sharing