Maybe there is something wrong with me but the “bad things are actually good because revealed preference” people and similar are the highlights of that site at this point. There is just something fascinating about it.

That’s true, but it just seems like a silly distinction cooked up by some overly paranoid lawyer working for firefox, that has no practical effect.

Manson has been accused by more than 10 different people of sexual assault, which is quite incomparable to the (still messy) Depp situation.

Best password ever, apparently!

Most people on lemmy don’t like either Clinton very much, I don’t like the Clintons either.

What’s more important is why you felt the need to make the point that Clinton did racist things, in response to “violent crime dropped between 1990 and 2000”.

Do you believe black people commit more crimes than non-black people? Yes or no?

I get the impression that you believe that black people commit more crimes.

You’re saying there is some kind of connection between Clinton being racist and crimes being reduced. How is that supposed to work?

Being racist somehow reduces crime? Excuse me?

Dems are known for reducing the amount of crime? Very interesting!

Homicide and other serious crimes dropped 40% between 1990 and 2000. That’s because this whole concept of a “nuclear family” is inherently fascist and causes more crime.

It’s a few hundred megabyte llm, not quite the same thing.

Sure, the march 1991 referendum supported preserving the USSR, but by that time Poland, Hungary and the baltics had already seceded, and Ukraine had a referendum with an opposite result 9 months later.

It’s a real mystery how the CIA managed to brainwash all the east european warsaw pact countries into hating the USSR while all of their media was still under the control of the proletariat.

Finland right now has the highest unemployment rate in the EU, so lack of young people can’t explain this particular problem.

That’s exactly what a domestic abuser would say!

Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no. If you don’t answer I will interpret that as a “no”.

I don’t think the memes and internet arguments count as rioting.

Think of a box with 4 particles a, b, c and d. If every particle is on the left side of the box, then there is only 1 way to divide them up. [(a, b, c, d), ()]

If there are 2 particles on the left side of the box and 2 particles on the right side of the box, then there are 6 ways to divide them up:

[(a, b), (c, d)]
[(a, c), (b, d)]
[(a, d), (b, c)]
[(b, c), (a, d)]
[(b, d), (a, c)]
[(c, d), (a, b)]

In total you’ve got 16 possible arrangements, the 2-2 state has the “highest” entropy because you’re more likely to end up with the one that takes up 6/16 arrangements.

Look the ancient rom- I mean greeks were bronze, that’s a totally different color from hispanic. Unfortunately bronze doesn’t exist anymore and all the scrolls were written in black and white so we can never verify this.