That’s still not it, though. Extracting maximum revenue is just the default state for all things in capitalism, so it is not a qualifier or distinction that is useful to identify enshitification.
Enshitification is a model specifically for platforms. It’s not enshitification if it isn’t a platform; that’s just sparkling greed.
Yep, pretty much all servers are. You could say that about anything. Lemmy is just someone else’s computer. Wikipedia is just someone else’s computer. 100% of network infrastructure is just someone else’s computer.
It’s actually least accurate for VPN in general than anything else, because it’s common to host a VPN for access to a local network and homelab services, or corporate network and internal work-related services, in which case the VPN server is not someone else’s computer.
Wrong. VPN is the encrypted tunnel between your computer and someone else’s computer.
You’re thinking of a VPS.
rk3399 has been on mainline for a good while, no? I think rk3588 is too at this point, even.
benevolent non-compliance
Wow the person that wrote this article clearly does not understand how open-source or piracy works. Using a closed-source game engine is not a factor in mitigating piracy, at all. Using an open-source game engine does not make Slay the Spire 2 open-source “by proxy” or otherwise.
rk3399 from experience
Oddly it does not even mention the biggest sin and problem with YAML: semantic whitespace.
The spec should just be identical to JSON
Iran had no involvement in 9/11. That was Saudi Arabia.
Okay, so yeah if you’re not a software developer, then forking it and developing the software is not an option for you. Your only option is to simply continue waiting for all of the software you use to be created by other people and handed to you, like you do already.
software gets forked and continued all the time
If you understand that this is true, then I don’t really understand your argument. If this happens all the time for other software, then why won’t it for Lutris? You’re just saying that people who are not software developers cannot develop software? Okay… yeah.
Those people are already completely dependent on software developers and their choices for all of the software they use, whether closed or open source, anyway.
It’s not like just anyone can fork any project and continue developing it.
Why not? Happens all the time.
I hear this argument a lot about many things
Perhaps there’s a reason you hear it so often about so many things?
This same principle also applies to the fediverse. An instance makes policy decisions that you don’t agree with? That’s okay, you can always host your own instance and make your own policies.
While I may not agree that letting AI write the code is a good idea, the complaints are dumber. It’s open source. Just fork it if you have a problem with it.
Trying to hide it is shitty and immature, though. Even more reason to just fork it. They are proving they don’t have the maturity or transparency needed to run a project like that.
A stream deck is not a steam deck
Their evidence seems good.
Literally no evidence provided at all besides speculation
Forgejo is the way
So absolutely nothing new? DLSS has always been slop.
EDIT: Lol @ the downvote, enjoy your fake, blurry frames. Reminder that artifacting used to be only for dying GPUs