

What is wrong with using Wikipedia and Amnesty as a source?


What is wrong with using Wikipedia and Amnesty as a source?
What about robotics?
“C’mon, Chinese govt lifted 800 million people out of extreme poverty. Took the country from one of the poorest in a world to a world power. All this in just 4 decades and you expect the people to hate the govt.”
deleted by creator
China is the one of the most populated country in the world. It produces about 30% of all manufactured goods many of which is consumed by rest of the world. So yeah there is going to be some pollution. If we take about on a per-person basis countries like the U.S. still emit more. Moreover, China is the largest investor in renewable energy and China alone accounted for roughly 40% of the world’s renewable energy investment.


just improve the UI, rest is great
Thanks! The pricing is very affordable. Will definitely consider it for increasing the size limit
Thank you so much for testing it out and taking the time to open the issues, really appreciate the feedback! I’ll take a look and work on them soon.
The person submitting the report would need to provide the file name and password.
Well, DeadDrop has name + password modal as well as direct link.
If you are referring to DMCA (should have directly mentioned it), then NO, this content is not gonna be allowed. Those files will be permanently deleted once it is reported.
Yes, once there’s enough traffic, I plan to add an option for sharing larger files. The cost will depend on the file size.
Can you please clarify what do you mean by YCMA?
Well, DeadDrop is still in its early stages of development and right now deaddrop is focused on sharing sensitive images and documents. Moreover, I don’t have money to pay the bills but will increase the size limit once the site gets good traffic. However, I can provide you upto 100 MB for free, DM me.
So with that logic, if a person reports CSAM to police. The police first has arrest the person who reported it. Am I right?
Thanks for mentioning this, I really appreciate it. I will considering implementing hash scanning before encryption to help prevent illegal content.
Oh boy! Didn’t know about that. But how do other platforms like dropbox, whatsapp and telegram tackle these problems. Don’t they first have verify a content to delete or report about it.
Well, one service shuts down and they move on to another. Instead, deal with the real culprits that do these illegal things. Shutting my or anyone else’s services will make no change.
Yes, fork the code from github and host it on your own server.
Isn’t ProleWiki explicitly ideological wiki aligned with Marxist-Leninist / pro-socialist perspectives? Moreover, Amnesty International has reported on alleged human-rights abuses by many different governments, including Western countries as well as China.