You get bed bugs by bringing infested items/animals/people into your home, not by sleeping in a bed with no duvet cover

No, i haven’t.

I didn’t think the person in the post cares about good waves, I think he cares about hanging out on a beach with a morning cocktail near some surfboards

K. That also has little to do with what you eat.

No deliberate misunderstanding here, your point just wasn’t very clear.

I mostly agree with you, btw. I brush my teeth twice a day, morning and night. I shower when I feel like I need a shower. Sometimes that’s morning, sometimes that’s night. I don’t get night sweats every time I go to sleep.

Neither of your points in either of your threads makes sense. Do you brush your teeth before getting out of bed? Do you shower before getting out of bed?

Breakfast

What you eat has very little to do with hair texture

I eat dinner though

I install whatever I want on my Linux desktop without thinking about it, and the file browser is still as fast as it was the day I installed it (really fast). I don’t have to do regular housekeeping to ensure basic functionality remains performant.

If the operating system is architected in such a way that simply installing things (you know, one of the main reasons to have a computer) degrades the performance of basic functionality, that’s a problem with the operating system.

That’s just a repurposed West Virginia/Kentucky joke

When are you guys gonna come up with new Ohio jokes, these ones were old two decades ago

Eh I already got enough plastic in my balls

Ah ok cool, that was the sort of middle ground option I was missing

Honest question, not necessarily for you but for maybe one of those people that actually understands the registry - how do those people figure that stuff out? Like, do software authors actually publish their registry config, or do people have to decompile/reverse engineer things to figure out what registry settings a given program might use?

Something is basic as an operating system’s file browsing program shouldn’t degrade in performance over time, and the solution for that degradation shouldn’t be reinstalling the operating system.

I commented to ask why you posted a comment that added nothing to the conversation. The first comment you replied to made a valid comparison to where the laws in question have already been implemented. Instead of engaging with that productively, you rudely dismissed it out of hand.

Maybe that’s an issue with social media and the other apps on children’s phones, and not the phones themselves. So maybe it requires a combination of regulation on social media, plus better awareness from parents, instead of a blanket ban on a technology tangentially related to the problem.

Then why did you comment lmao

I’m getting close…