

Mkay, then your point is based solely on xenophobia and incorrect assumptions. I hope you take a moment to reflect on that, and try and come up with something better.


Mkay, then your point is based solely on xenophobia and incorrect assumptions. I hope you take a moment to reflect on that, and try and come up with something better.
Hell yeah another clit stick user, there are dozens of us!
You’re with the normies in spirit, at least


You act like the people that were here before didn’t have laws or society or ways of dealing with outsiders, and that’s pretty fucking gross of you


Liara T’soni would never


They could do so much with that concept too. Like imagine the little picnics you could do out in the wild zones in sword and shield, except that’s just every time you go back and visit Oak’s lab. It could give you way more incentive to come back to your home town


Self censorship makes a platform more attractive to an advertiser

The mortar bed and plywood are sitting on concrete?
No, they’re both supported by the floor joists, which might be sitting on a poured concrete wall that runs underneath the bathroom. It’s a little hard to see exactly what’s going on under the floor, visibility isn’t great under the bathroom from the basement. Filling in the plywood section with mortar would require building out some sort of form to keep it from running into the basement.
The mortar seems pretty robust. The only way I’d be able to get it out would probably be the rotary hammer or a big sledge hammer or something. Ideally I’d like to just put SLC down as-is, I just want to make sure the cracks and divots won’t cause any problems with that. The floor transitions to hardwood, and currently the bathroom subfloor sits about a 1/2" lower than the hardwood, so I’m hoping that’s enough to fit a layer of SLC, ditra, and tile. I would like it to be flush, but I’m not super concerned if the bathroom floor ends up a tad taller.
I appreciate the feedback though, thank you!
People who’s first language is not English don’t necessarily know about those characters, and they probably don’t play nicely with screen readers and other accessibility tools. They aren’t even disambiguating anything, because there’s still disagreement on when to use thorn, and when to use eth. Using them is just a dumb flex. There’s no upsides.


Implying that a woman has obtained a position of power by performing a sex act is misogynist. Implying that Erika Kirk obtained her new position by performing a sex act distracts from the actual facts: she’s using her husband’s death and influence to obtain power. I appreciate the nuance you’re trying to bring to the conversation, but you’re sort of falling into the trap the original commenter laid - you’re letting yourself get distracted from the fact that Erika Kirk is terrible because she’s an evil human being, not because she’s a woman who may or may not perform sex acts.


The original comment is putting “performs oral sex” in the same moral category as “uses dead husband’s bigoted beliefs and influence to put herself in positions of power in an authoritarian government”. That’s asinine. I don’t feel the need to tolerate such stupid opinions. Sex work is real work, and performing sex acts between consenting adults is not immoral.


Stop. It’s 2026, we don’t need to do this sex shaming bullshit anymore. Giving blowjobs doesn’t make you a bad person. Being good at blowjobs doesn’t make you a bad person. Don’t lump Erika fucking Kirk in with people who are simply good at blowjobs. Erika Kirk is a bad person because she’s profiting off of her husband’s death. Erika Kirk is a bad person because she’s continuing her husband’s legacy of hate and bigotry. Blowjobs have nothing to do with it, and you’re muddying the waters by making that the focus.


I’m trying to relate the daylight savings time change back to your example of jetlag.
I’m suggesting that, in a scenario where everyone in the US is compelled to take a plane ride that gives them all one hour’s worth of jetlag (instead of changing the clocks by one hour), you’d probably take issue with that. It’s an attempt to add some extra perspective and get you to think about your claim that it’s stupid to argue from a health perspective, and how shallow that line is thinking is.
It doesn’t matter if it’s stupid or not, it’s reasonable to want the practice to stop.


If you don’t have space for a bread maker, you can make some pretty excellent no-knead loaves with nothing more than a big bowl and a spoon
Looks like a ministry of funny walks convention
Probably loot boxes since it more directly targets children


If there were two days a year that 300 million people took a flight that gave them all jetlag simultaneously, you’d probably tell them to stop though, right?


Well that, but also it’s a really fucking cool language


"But surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got.”
I get what she’s saying, but like… It’s shouldn’t take a whole fucking lot of deliberation to be like “mass surveillance? Lethal autonomy? How about no”
Yes