I see. And what about people with Swyer Syndrome? They can live their entire lives with no one, not even them, suspecting their chromosomes are XY. Men? Should we be genetically testing every woman to make sure she isn’t really a man and doesn’t know it?
A 2017 study estimated that the incidence of Swyer syndrome is approximately 1 in 100,000 females.[22] Fewer than 100 cases have been reported as of 2018. There are extremely rare instances of familial Swyer syndrome.[23][24]
A man is a person of male gender identity, i.e. identifying as a male
A woman is a person of female gender identity, i.e. identifying as a female
That’s all there is to it, since the very concept of gender identity revolves around a purely social phenomenon of gender - which many people try to forcefully connect to sex, which is not the same thing and won’t ever be.
Removed by mod
Go ahead and define a woman for us then. Since you seem to know the definition.
Removed by mod
“A woman is someone with XY chromosomes…”
off to a good start
Haha 😂😂 My bad on the typo y’all
I see, so this person is not a woman:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30799415/
They got pregnant, but their chromosomes are XXY.
So what are they?
Removed by mod
Cool. Thanks for your queerphobic take.
Disagreement with the politically correct about transgender is necessarily transphobic.
Do tell me where you studied genetics at a graduate level to make the determination you just made.
Otherwise yeah, you’re being a queerphobe.
Your right: only the elite and/or those with a university degrees can discuss this issue.
Removed by mod
I see. And what about people with Swyer Syndrome? They can live their entire lives with no one, not even them, suspecting their chromosomes are XY. Men? Should we be genetically testing every woman to make sure she isn’t really a man and doesn’t know it?
Removed by mod
Such a person can compete in womens sports FAIC.
wp:Swyer syndrome
You are defining ‘woman’ by whether or not sports officials decide they can compete with other women? And then you try to use science afterward?
I think anyone who defines wt:thonself as a woman should be able to compete in any Olympic event as a woman.
Seems like if you have to make exceptions for your definition to work, it’s not a very good definition.
A man is a person of male gender identity, i.e. identifying as a male
A woman is a person of female gender identity, i.e. identifying as a female
That’s all there is to it, since the very concept of gender identity revolves around a purely social phenomenon of gender - which many people try to forcefully connect to sex, which is not the same thing and won’t ever be.