This is upsetting 😠

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Galaxy’s Edge feels emblematic about the issues of design under Iger versus Eisner.

    Eisner vastly expanded park capacity, but he didn’t just focus on E-ticket attractions. He intentionally built some parts of the parks to entertain but cheaper to add capacity and give people a place to be entertained if they didn’t want to wait in long lines.

    In contrast, most of Iger’s expansions were generally a lot more costly and didn’t have the throughout of previous E-ticket attractions. This ended up pushing Disney into being a more premium experience.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The budget for Galaxys Edge was cut by Chapek, it was only part of what was planned and what did get implemented was often less than originally planned.

      Other than cutting the budget, I think were they went wrong with it was making too high a concept for a theme park and centering it around the less popular sequel franchise time line. It made for a confusing experience for a more casual Star Wars fan.

      I stand by RotR being an S tier ride, when it isnt operating broken, because its over complicated and the maintenance budgets were cut.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The problem is that Galaxy’s Edge got descoped later in the design process while Eisner made decisions early on in the design process to ensure a cheaper park.