• bdonvrA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re asking you to label it not censor it

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh wow you censor it to all the people that hide NSFW!!! Dude this platform doesn’t have an algorithm, unless someone hides NSFW they will see the post, and if they do hide NSFW, maybe it’s because they don’t want to see it?

      • einkorn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, it just means people have to actively make a single click to disable the blur.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Beep has some really fucked up opinions. Between this and removing artist signatures, they’ve got to just be a troll.

          • bdonvrA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Except people can configure if they want NSFW posts blurred or not. You can set it to not if you like.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              Okay? That is completely separate to the fact it is still censorship. This image has nothing that is deserving of being censored to where the individual must go through hoops to avoid said censorship.

              This image isn’t NSFW.

              • bdonvrA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s a sexual comic whose entire subject is basically “horny alien wants to fuck”

                Marking it NSFW isn’t “censorship” it’s just a warning… What do you actually think censorship means?

              • naticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes it is. Sexual content doesn’t fly in most professional offices and people get reported to HR for less.

          • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            “Not Safe for Work” people want to browse at work, and could get fired for having this comic scroll past.

            The fact people could get fired for this is total bullshit. But it is what it is. Tagging gives people options.

            This isn’t about judgement, it’s about making spaces for people to enjoy without risking their jobs.

          • einkorn@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Your definition of censorship is off then. Censorship would mean the content is not accessible at all. I.e. bars above genitals in Japanese hentai.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Gonna say that your definition is off. Censorship isn’t about completely blocking access but restricting that access, either permanently or through making one jump through hoops for that access.

      • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really appreciate all your efforts to bring content to the community!

        Tagging gives people who could get fired the option to have the content blurred until they click it.

        We try not to be judgemental assholes here, but plenty of our bosses are judgemental assholes.

        That’s why the tag is “Not Safe for Work”.

        It is more generous to err on the side of caution.

        It also result in more reach, because the other option available to folks with shitty bosses is just to block users and instances that don’t tag things.

        I.e. I’ve blocked everything here with the word “moe” because holy shit those folks have no fucking clue how to tag anything.

      • bdonvrA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s complete and utter nonsense.