Having large numbers of people starve to death seems like a pretty damning indictment of a system. But I dunno, maybe I’m overly attached to food?

  • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    A carbon tax falls well within a capitalist system (much the same as any other tax or method of dealing with externalities) so I’d put that as a failure of democratic systems more than anything.

    I’m also not convinced communism would actually solve the problem. Communists have historically been pretty reluctant to share bad news, from letting folks know about mass starvations to, oh, most of the world news in China.

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whether you realise it or not, you are making a very poor argument. I could reply that eating food falls well within a communist system, therefore you can’t blame communism for famines.

      The fact is that the majority of the world is capitalist (including, of course, major oil companies who have known about climate change for decades and hid the research) and yet the planet is still being made uninhabitable almost as quickly as we possibly can.

      Why does capitalism get a free pass for this but communism doesn’t get the same treatment?

      • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        could reply that eating food falls well within a communist system, therefore you can’t blame communism for famines.

        Try again when you’re sober, that’s not a particular cogent argument.

        • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I didn’t actually make that argument, I just said that I could. It would be of a similar quality to the argument you actually made though.

          (Your argument is argument is poor because although carbon taxes could fall under a capitalist system, they are not being implemented in a way that is actually useful. You are arguing hypothetical but unrealised positives for capitalism but not allowing such arguments for communism.)

          I won’t be replying to you again because I have better things to do than argue online.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      A carbon tax won’t address habitat destruction for revenue generation or planned obsolescence models used in order to extract the maximum of sales regardless of waste generated.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And what is it that’s been undermining the democratic systems? Extreme concentration of wealth, courtesy of capitalism.