• Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, that’s a different claim though. This person claims riots to have already occurred because of it, to wit - where?

      • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That other person argued that the riots already occurred and you falsely dismissed them. It was my position that he’s going to call for riots whether his property gets seized or not, and I’ll add that he can’t do it as effectively if he’s in a 6x10 cell without any of his personal possessions with him.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          He might call for them, he does for everything. The difference being people will go to the auction to buy his shit, can’t do that at a riot and say for instance it does turn to a riot or would be at his property and they would be stealing his shit. To wit - have at why even wait for the auction, that fucks kids got over 2billion while he was in office so take it back if you feel like it.