Also, I don’t just mean they are reactionary in certain area or in their personal life (Like Aristotle was important for biology despite being an apologies for slavery)?

I mean worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they’re reactionary.

Possible suggestions (not saying they’re justified) that I expect people would put forward include:

  • Carl Scmitt
  • Heidegger
    • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the Paul Schrader movie about his life is my favourite film. Beautifully shot dissection of the pathologies that made him a fascist.

  • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nietzsche. He’s a reactionary but he diagnoses some of the problems of modernity correctly. He articulates the appeal of the heroic or mythic and the dearth of that in bourgeois society. The Ubermensch (not necessarily the Nazi ideal) is a reactionary response to the crisis of the death of God that needs to be overcome (ironically, I can’t think of a better term off the top of my head than ‘overcome’, so even in my critique I’m still operating within Nietzschean terms).

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I enjoyed Mishima Yukio when I was younger, almost as a morbid fascination/character study. As a non-western nationalist, he wasn’t happy with American hegemony/occupation, including the use of Japan as a staging ground for the Korean War (“It was supposed to be our turn to bomb Korea”). Unlike the American conservatives I was used to, he had an actual culture to write about, so he could write florid prose about some aspect of Japanese culture and talk about how it’s being destroyed by neoliberalism and it’s a little bit more reasonable than the things the American right whines about (though it’s important to remember that his cause was abhorrent and fascist).

    A lot of his writing subverted my expectations of what the right could look like - though I encountered him before the Alt-Right was a thing. In some ways, I feel like he prepared me for the Alt-right. He was all about the Chad meme and bodybuilding and strong muscular men, he was (most likely) gay, and in one of his novels the protagonist cucks the imperial prince (despite Mishima’s affection for imperial rule). A lot of the Milo Yiannopoulos-type bits and subversiveness and attempts at third-positionism were kinda like :seen-this-one: