• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But how many trains is more trains? Because you’re talking about enough trains to make up for the loss of thousands upon thousands of trucks from the road. That sounds a hell of a lot more than, say, one train an hour. In fact, it sounds like people would be held up at crossings constantly.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      One train per hour would be on the very high side. It would likely be a lot less.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why would it be a lot less? I just looked it up and there are 13.86 million trucks on the road in the US. How many cars would a train need to make up for that in a once-per-hour schedule over a 24-hour period?