• TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If everybody had a horse it wouldn’t be much different, though. There are way more people on earth now than when horses were still the main mode of transportation. Horses would cause similar problems as our other livestock for climate change.

    People powered vehicles (bicycles, skateboards, etc.) are the only thing that we have that are truly zero impact forms of transportation. I guess we could count solar and wind powered vehicles, but those don’t really get the job done for our transportation needs.

    We need to focus on public transportation, but so many people would refuse to ever vote for that stuff.

    • havokdj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I wouldn’t say TRULY zero impact. There are some things that would still contribute such as the need for more calories and also the work we would exert making pollution from ourselves, but it is still 10,000x more beneficial than what we have with cars or horses.

      Honestly, horses may even be worse because you don’t really turn them off like cars. Depending on how often you drive, horses may wind up causing even more pollution than if you just drove.

      Also, horses are really, REALLY expensive, not just in initial cost either, and their legs are like glass.

      Not defending cars at all BTW, just supporting what you said on horses.