• can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        When it’s targeted at a specific group of people and there’s such a dramatic power imbalance, yes. Whether modern definitions agree or not.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          All wars are targeted at a specific group of people.

          So if your definition amounts to a highly favorable balance of power, then all countries at war would aspire to make it a “genocide”.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            All wars are targeted at a specific group of people.

            Yes, my wording was vague. But say you went to war with Canada, a diverse nation. It would feel different if you broadly targeted all Canadians rather than specifically indigenous Canadians, or black Canadians, for example.

            And putting this on the table now: I am Canadian and I recognise my country was built upon its own genocide.

            Edit: Someone else feel free to chime in, I still don’t feel I am conveying this well

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Ok, then why would a hypothetical US invasion of Canada (which today, unlike in 1812, would be imbalanced in favor of the US) be better than an Israeli invasion of Gaza?

              • can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It wouldn’t be better but the circumstances would determine whether my mind would immediately jump to calling it that. I’m not necessarily quick to jump to claiming genocide but I won’t readily denounce it.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Fair enough, but if an invasion of Canada is not necessarily genocide then there must be more to it than attacking a less powerful neighbor.