I mainly use imgur to upload screenshots using sharex, would appreciate being pointed in the direction of any alternative.

  • jherazob@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been considering to self-host, Imgur clearly no longer wants to be in the image hosting business and wants to focus on their “community” instead

    • steakfries@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      do they have a sizable community? honestly i just assumed it was almost exclusively used for image hosting.

      • Jurisprudentia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s home to a very strange community unaware that their “platform” was just an image host for users of an actual social media platform. Well, at least it was before imgur recently started adding social media features and purged nsfw content.

        Popular image posts from reddit would routinely get boosted (sans context) to the top of imgur’s homepage, which would attract confused, angry, and often unintentionally hilarious comments from imgur users. Iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to this phenomenon.

        Edit: sp

    • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some instances/servers are currently not capable of uploads larger than ~100kb, so a good image CDN is desired.

      • Zoop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also feel like lots of people uploading images directly to an instance’s servers put a lot more strain on them - especially at a time where most servers are experiencing serious growing pains and may not really have the funds to keep expanding their storage. They’re not ad supported like places like Reddit are.

        I think it would be courteous of us to try and spread it out a bit and use services specifically intended for and set up for image hosting.

  • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve not looked into it fully but there is that pixelfed which is a part of the fediverse, don’t know how it works for public images and whatnot though since it touts itself as a secure platform where you can choose who can see your stuff kind of deal

  • Windshear@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone who doesn’t know, what’s wrong with imgur?

    Edit: Thanks for the info guys.

    • idle@158436977.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imgur announced recently they are going to be purging images that haven’t been viewed for x amount of time.

      • bouncing@partizle.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not necessarily a bad thing, as long as you aren’t using it for archival purposes. I would prefer not everything I post live forever.

        • StateParkMasturbator@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I’d agree for identifying pictures, image hosting that suddenly doesn’t one day becomes a huge problem for a lot of old tutorial-based content. Look at any old car forum for examples.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re just shitposting dank memes, having the pictures deleted after a while shouldn’t be a big problem. If you’re posting something a bit more valuable, consider keeping the pictures on flickr or even pixelfed.

        • parlaptie@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is pixelfed really a good way to prevent dead links? I don’t know much about it other than that it’s part of the fediverse, so I’d assume any pictures hosted there last only as long as the instance they’re posted to.

            • parlaptie@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I suppose you’re right, though that’s quite involved when all I want is to host an image.

              • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Using flickr or google would be a lighter option. If you put some pictures in a place like that, they are probably going to stay there, but the TOS does leave a very convenient backdoor open. If flickr messes up a database migration, or the datacenter gets hit by a meteor one day, and all of your photos disappear, you can’t hold them accountable. Every option has some issues…