• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not clever enough to make an “old wives tales” joke here, but there’s definitely something there

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My elderly mother texted to wish my daughter a happy birthday today and her birthday is in two days, so I can’t say I’m shocked.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It takes a lot of work to get them to think critically.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It sounds like – though is not explicitly stated – that this study is specific to the 2020 election. I’m not sure that this can be generalized to all misinformation.

    I could easily imagine election involvement being different than, say, information about Ukraine.

    Also, the criteria here was whether people linked to sites used to spread misinformation, rather than whether an individual story was true or not. So the metric here is maybe specific to ability to evaluate how sketchy an online news source is. If, for example, a friend posted some information directly, it might be that behavior would be different.