• Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    if Clinton got to choose scotus justices instead of Trump, RvW would not have been overturned.

    doubt

    Where the fuck are all you liberals coming from?

    • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not a liberal, I’m not even sure you know what a liberal is.

      Clinton would have no incentive and nothing to gain by overturning RvW, and people don’t usually do things without an incentive.

      Trump was highly incentivized because his entire political culture is about “winning” and “making the liberals cry”, and overturning RvW did make his voterbase feel like they got a giant win and it did make liberals cry.

      • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        It would have been done anyway though. It was the court and Clinton wouldn’t have been able to put any other judges in anyway. And yes you are a liberal (at best).

        • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t see any reason why Clinton would be forced to pick the exact same scotus judges.

          I’m not a liberal just because I might make you uncomfortable by challenging your established ways of thinking.

          • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not a liberal just because I might make you uncomfortable by challenging your established ways of thinking.

            No you’re a liberal because you are twisting yourself in a pretzel to advocate for Biden as “harm reduction”

            Please fuck off.

            • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              I did not, will not ever advocate for Biden, because he is pro-genocide of Palestine. I don’t think “harm reduction” or “lesser of two evils” is the solution.

              Please do not make wildly tangential assumptions, it’s not beneficial to dialogue. Treat the conversation you have with me as a conversation with me, and not an amalgamation of conversations you’ve had with other people.

              • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                You transgressed orthodoxy by suggesting that democrats could be appreciably different from republicans in any way and now will be treated as hostile. You’re right, for what it is worth.

            • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I’m not the person you’re responding to, but I would never advocate for Biden, but I would also never support advocate for Trump. He’s clearly the worse option for a myriad of other reasons.

              I really do understand why a Palestinian American would not vote for Biden right now though and would never ask them to.

              • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                6 months ago

                Nobody here is talking about supporting Trump we are talking about material conditions. You’re way out of your depth here please read a book.

                • BabyTurtles [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Is it possible for everyone to agree that criticizing specifically Democrats or Clinton or Biden is not a support of Trump, and criticizing specifically Trump is not a support of Biden.

                • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yeah and I think we’re both falling on the other side of these material conditions. I believe the material conditions of putting Trump in power is worse than having Biden.

                  • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Which material conditions are better under Biden?

                    Wages are down Cost of living, including,rent,groceries,housing, is up

                    One million+ Americans are dead from COVID, and millions more are suffering from continued Infections and long COVID.

                    Corporate Greed has made most routine restaurant visits worse. Most places are understaffed, leading to waiting longer for lower quality food at higher prices.

                    Many of my favorite chain stores are closing completely. Great economy ass!

                    Biden broke a major strike

                    Infrastructure like major bridges are falling apart because pete is an idiot that isn’t qualified for the job he was gifted for dropping out of 2020.

                    Immigrants continue to be deported in record numbers.

                    Kids are still in cages.

                    Every summer is the hottest in history, while this administration puts tariffs on cheap electric vehicles and solar panels that could help.

                    LGBT, especially T, material conditions are horrific in many places, and the Dems aren’t doing anything to fix that.

                    Women in many states lost their right to choose, and the Dems aren’t doing anything to materially fix that.

              • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.netM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I really do understand why a Palestinian American would not vote for Biden

                then have some solidarity with Palestinians and stop the ridiculous “harm reduction” rhetoric. nobody here is advocating for trump. those comments are removed and the users don’t last long on here since our admins are great and actually ban reactionaries.

                if you want to actually delineate these “material conditions” you claim will be worse under trump compared to biden please share them

                • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Okay, I will later when I have time. Probably days from now if not more than a week. One short thing I would argue is many things are generally worse with every passing year because (1) there has been a rightward trend in the Overton window, (2) the conservatives have been on a long, calculated campaign to gain political supremacy by diminishing voting rights, hacking away at federal power, and increasing the role of capital in political decision-making, primarily through the capture of the Judiciary (and its ideology).

                  Biden sucks and is pathetic in his response to RvW being overturned, for example. But it doesn’t matter if you had Chomsky himself as president, nothing could have been done to change that decision.

                  I just don’t think the solution is to then shift the Overton window even more right than where it is by voting for Trump, potentially making a lot of these issues (particularly in regards to voting rights), harder to shift left.

                  • a president who opposed the rightward shift would have pushed court stacking and added justices until RvW was safe. or pushed a bill codifying abortion rights. dems had a voting majority in both houses and any dem who didnt vote for it would be giving up their reelection chance. ofc the rotating villain would vote against it and just take a high paying private sector job when their term ends.

                    the role of dems is to slow or stop leftward momentum by doing nothing so that the republicans can take over and move the country rightward. the overton window means nothing when regular citizens have no say in politics and can only vote for the mean fascist or the nice fascist. the overton window is meaningful if it is far left enough to push ppl into revolutionary action.

                    and, once again, stop strawmanning, nobody here is advocating for voting for trump. also, trump in office does not push the overton window right. it empowers the most rabid americans and would increase violence against the left, but that is going to happen under biden anyways with the right leaning state and municipal governments

        • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s just false. Two justices were appointed by Trump, one of which replaced RBG and she died. The other would arguably still be Kennedy because he wouldn’t have retired under Clinton, and he was probably less reactionary than Kavanaugh (time will tell). Also, Trump appointed a massive amount of lower court judges and that greatly affects what cases even make it up to the Supreme Court. A 5-4 majority by conservatives is wildly different than a 6-3 majority with massive lower court support.

          I don’t know how you can say “Clinton wouldn’t have been able to put any other judges in anyway” when we know that she would have replaced RBG.

      • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        The difference between liberals and the left on this issue is that leftists see this system as fundamentally unjust and desire to tear it down. I don’t want to play electoral games with the Supreme Court, where the whims of when certain people die and which lib is in power at the right time to replace them puts our basic rights at risk forever. That’s bullshit!

        I don’t want to put “better judges” on the court. The real problem is the court itself, and the Constitution that created it. We need to abolish this undemocratic court.

        Liberals will NEVER allow this. Enjoy dealing with your right to your own body being tossed around like a football for the rest of your life. If all you do is vote that’s what you’re getting. Or you can read some theory, understand the left, and help us build a revolution that tears this rotten government apart once and for all.